Unlike many projects on GitHub, the Go project does not use its bug tracker for general discussion or asking questions.
We only use our bug tracker for tracking bugs and tracking proposals going through the [Proposal Process](https://go.dev/s/proposal-process).

For asking questions, see:

* [The golang-nuts mailing list](https://groups.google.com/d/forum/golang-nuts)

* [The Go Forum](https://forum.golangbridge.org/), a web-based forum

 * Phantom reference with a {@code finalizeReferent()} method which a background thread invokes
 * after the garbage collector reclaims the referent. This is a simpler alternative to using a
 * {@link ReferenceQueue}.
 *
 * <p>Unlike a normal phantom reference, this reference will be cleared automatically.
 *
 * @author Bob Lee
 * @since 2.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

   * I/O resource, it should generally be safe in the case of a resource that's being used only for
   * reading, such as an {@code InputStream}. Unlike with writable resources, there's no chance that
   * a failure that occurs when closing the stream indicates a meaningful problem such as a failure
   * to flush all bytes to the underlying resource.
   *

     * StackOverflowError (from deep transform(..., directExecutor()) nesting), and calling
     * setException(stackOverflowError) would fail:
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output
     * Future, then a call setException() would likely also overflow.
     *

setting [Transport.DisableKeepAlives] to `true` will disable connection reuse.
However, such performance degradation usually indicates improper configuration
or usage of [Transport] or [Client] in the first place, and a deeper look would

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

  alias(libs.plugins.extra.java.module.info)
}

dependencies {
  implementation(projects.okhttp)
  implementation(projects.loggingInterceptor)

  // Force version 26.0.2-1 which is a proper JPMS module, unlike transitive 13.0
  implementation(libs.jetbrains.annotations)

  testImplementation(projects.okhttp)
  testImplementation(projects.loggingInterceptor)
  testImplementation(projects.mockwebserver3)

 * limitations under the License.
 *
 */
package mockwebserver3

import java.io.IOException
import okio.BufferedSink

/**
 * The body of a [MockResponse].
 *
 * Unlike [okhttp3.ResponseBody], this interface is designed to be implemented by writers and not
 * called by readers.
 */
public interface MockResponseBody {
  /** The length of this response in bytes, or -1 if unknown. */