extends SimpleImmutableEntry<@Nullable K, @Nullable V> {
  private final RemovalCause cause;

  /**
   * Creates a new {@code RemovalNotification} for the given {@code key}/{@code value} pair, with
   * the given {@code cause} for the removal. The {@code key} and/or {@code value} may be {@code
   * null} if they were already garbage collected.
   *
   * @since 19.0
   */

   *
   * <p>Unlike {@link Character#codePointAt(CharSequence, int)} or {@link String#codePointAt(int)}
   * this method will never fail silently when encountering an invalid surrogate pair.
   *
   * <p>The behaviour of this method is as follows:
   *
   * <ol>
   *   <li>If {@code index >= end}, {@link IndexOutOfBoundsException} is thrown.

   *
   * <p>Unlike {@link Character#codePointAt(CharSequence, int)} or {@link String#codePointAt(int)}
   * this method will never fail silently when encountering an invalid surrogate pair.
   *
   * <p>The behaviour of this method is as follows:
   *
   * <ol>
   *   <li>If {@code index >= end}, {@link IndexOutOfBoundsException} is thrown.

   * column key {@code c}, the returned table contains a mapping with row key {@code r} and column
   * key {@code c}. If that row key / column key pair in not in {@code table}, the pair maps to
   * {@code null} in the generated table.
   *
   * <p>The returned table allows subsequent {@code put} calls with the row keys in {@code

          inv.containsValue(reversed.getValue()));
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): This is a bit stronger than super.expectMissing(), which permits a <key,
       * someOtherValue> pair.
       */
      assertNull(
          "Inverse should not return a mapping for key " + reversed.getKey(),
          inv.get(reversed.getKey()));
    }
  }

@NullMarked
public abstract class IteratorTester<E extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractIteratorTester<E, Iterator<E>> {
  /**
   * Creates an IteratorTester.
   *
   * @param steps how many operations to test for each tested pair of iterators
   * @param features the features supported by the iterator
   */
  protected IteratorTester(
      int steps,
      Iterable<? extends IteratorFeature> features,
      Iterable<E> expectedElements,

 * Provides lookup tables for converting between DOS and NT error representations.
 */
public interface DosError {

    /**
     * Mapping table from DOS error codes to NT status codes.
     * Each entry contains a pair of [DOS error code, NT status code].
     */
    int[][] DOS_ERROR_CODES = { { 0x00000000, 0x00000000 }, { 0x00010001, 0xc0000002 }, { 0x00010002, 0xc0000002 },

 * Provides lookup tables for converting between DOS and NT error representations.
 */
public interface DosError {

    /**
     * Mapping table from DOS error codes to NT status codes.
     * Each entry contains a pair of [DOS error code, NT status code].
     */
    int[][] DOS_ERROR_CODES =
            { { 0x00000000, 0x00000000 }, { 0x00010001, 0xc0000002 }, { 0x00010002, 0xc0000002 }, { 0x00020001, 0xc000000f },

    target.append(str);
  }

  @Override
  public void write(String str, int off, int len) throws IOException {
    checkNotNull(str);
    checkNotClosed();
    // tricky: append takes start, end pair...
    target.append(str, off, off + len);
  }

  @Override
  public void flush() throws IOException {
    checkNotClosed();
    if (target instanceof Flushable) {
      ((Flushable) target).flush();
    }

 * {@code escape(s.substring(0, n)) + escape(s.substring(n))} for arbitrary {@code n}. This is
 * because of the possibility of splitting a surrogate pair. The only case in which it is safe to
 * escape strings and concatenate the results is if you can rule out this possibility, either by
 * splitting an existing long string into short strings adaptively around {@linkplain