}
		if fmt.Sprintf("%v", err) != fmt.Sprintf("%v", tt.wanterr) {
			t.Errorf("%d. got error = %v; want %v", i, err, tt.wanterr)
		}
	}
}

func TestReaderAtConcurrent(t *testing.T) {
	// Test for the race detector, to verify ReadAt doesn't mutate
	// any state.
	r := NewReader([]byte("0123456789"))
	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
		wg.Add(1)
		go func(i int) {
			defer wg.Done()

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Standalone code to reproduce the issue
      description: Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem. Please share a link to Colab, Jupyter, or any notebook.
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
      value:
      render: shell
    validations:
      required: true

  address, without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
  professional setting

## Our Responsibilities

Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior, in compliance with the
licensing terms applying to the Project developments.

 * <p>Rate limiters are often used to restrict the rate at which some physical or logical resource
 * is accessed. This is in contrast to {@link java.util.concurrent.Semaphore} which restricts the
 * number of concurrent accesses instead of the rate (note though that concurrency and rate are
 * closely related, e.g. see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little%27s_law">Little's
 * Law</a>).
 *

           *
           * ...when we build with JDK 22 and run under JDK 8.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("MultimapsTest")
      /*
       * Luckily, we don't care about analyzing tests at all. We'd skip them all if we could do so
       * trivially, but it's enough to skip these ones.
       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {

   * onto the 1/rate (i.e. intervals) that is effective at the given storedPermits. "storedPermits"
   * essentially measure unused time; we spend unused time buying/storing permits. Rate is
   * "permits / time", thus "1 / rate = time / permits". Thus, "1/rate" (time / permits) times
   * "permits" gives time, i.e., integrals on this function (which is what storedPermitsToWaitTime()

    public boolean isActive() {
        return active;
    }

    public void enable() {
        active = true;

        // TODO if it was null, we really need to go find them now... or is this taken care of by the ordering?
        if (children != null) {
            for (ResolutionNode node : children) {
                node.enable();
            }
        }
    }

    public void disable() {

     * from any repository but are present among the set of specified projects will not cause an exception. Instead,
     * those unresolved artifacts will be returned in the result set, allowing the caller to take special care of
     * artifacts that haven't been build yet.
     *

A `Request` also has a `request.receive`, that's a function to "receive" the body of the request.

The `scope` `dict` and `receive` function are both part of the ASGI specification.

And those two things, `scope` and `receive`, are what is needed to create a new `Request` instance.

      panels.timeSeries.base(
        'Push Errors', queries.xdsErrors, |||
          Number of push errors. Many of these are at least potentional fatal and should be explored in-depth via Istiod logs.
          Note: metrics here do not use rate() to avoid missing transition from "No series"; series are not reported if there are no errors at all.
        |||
      ),
      panels.heatmap.base(
        'Push Time', queries.pushTime, |||