globalBucketTargetSys.set(buckets[i], meta) // set remote replication targets
	}
}

func (sys *BucketMetadataSys) refreshBucketsMetadataLoop(ctx context.Context) {
	const bucketMetadataRefresh = 15 * time.Minute

	sleeper := newDynamicSleeper(2, 150*time.Millisecond, false)

	t := time.NewTimer(bucketMetadataRefresh)
	defer t.Stop()
	for {
		select {
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return
		case <-t.C:

		Tiers:       make(map[string]madmin.TierConfig),
	}
}

func (config *TierConfigMgr) refreshTierConfig(ctx context.Context, objAPI ObjectLayer) {
	const tierCfgRefresh = 15 * time.Minute
	r := rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().UnixNano()))
	randInterval := func() time.Duration {
		return time.Duration(r.Float64() * 5 * float64(time.Second))
	}

			return s.NewHTTPTransportWithTimeout(1 * time.Minute)
		}
		return transport
	}

	return globalRemoteTargetTransport
}

// NewHTTPTransport returns a new http configuration
// used while communicating with the cloud backends.
func NewHTTPTransport() *http.Transport {
	return NewHTTPTransportWithTimeout(1 * time.Minute)
}

// Default values for dial timeout

### Just Modern Python { #just-modern-python }

It's all based on standard **Python type** declarations (thanks to Pydantic). No new syntax to learn. Just standard modern Python.

If you need a 2 minute refresher of how to use Python types (even if you don't use FastAPI), check the short tutorial: [Python Types](python-types.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

You write standard Python with types:

```Python

    // Connection pool configuration
    private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_POOL_SIZE = 100;
    private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_IDLE_TIME = 300000; // 5 minutes in ms
    private static final int DEFAULT_HEALTH_CHECK_INTERVAL = 60000; // 1 minute in ms
    private static final int DEFAULT_PROACTIVE_CHECK_INTERVAL = 30000; // 30 seconds in ms
    private int maxPoolSize = DEFAULT_MAX_POOL_SIZE;

Claro, os invasores não tentariam tudo isso de forma manual, eles escreveriam um programa para fazer isso, possivelmente com milhares ou milhões de testes por segundo. E obteriam apenas uma letra a mais por vez.

Mas fazendo isso, em alguns minutos ou horas os invasores teriam adivinhado o usuário e senha corretos, com a "ajuda" da nossa aplicação, apenas usando o tempo levado para responder.

#### Corrija com o `secrets.compare_digest()`

        int expected =
            force32(aUnsigned.bigIntegerValue().subtract(bUnsigned.bigIntegerValue()).intValue());
        UnsignedInteger unsignedSub = aUnsigned.minus(bUnsigned);
        assertThat(unsignedSub.intValue()).isEqualTo(expected);
      }
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // multiply
  public void testTimes() {

		roi.EventType = ReplicateExisting
		globalReplicationPool.Get().queueReplicaTask(roi)
	}
	return
}

const (
	mrfSaveInterval  = 5 * time.Minute
	mrfQueueInterval = mrfSaveInterval + time.Minute // A minute higher than save interval

	mrfRetryLimit = 3 // max number of retries before letting scanner catch up on this object version
	mrfMaxEntries = 1000000
)

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

        testBoundaryValue(1L);
        testBoundaryValue(-1L);

        // Test one second boundaries
        testBoundaryValue(1000L);
        testBoundaryValue(-1000L);

        // Test one minute boundaries
        testBoundaryValue(60000L);
        testBoundaryValue(-60000L);

        // Test one hour boundaries
        testBoundaryValue(3600000L);
        testBoundaryValue(-3600000L);