*
     * Since we can't ACK settings on the current reader thread (the reader thread can't write) we
     * execute all peer settings logic on the writer thread. This relies on the fact that the
     * writer task queue won't reorder tasks; otherwise settings could be applied in the opposite
     * order than received.
     */
    fun applyAndAckSettings(
      clearPrevious: Boolean,

        }
        return toReturn;
      }

      @GuardedBy("lock")
      /*
       * The GuardedBy checker warns us that we're not holding cancellationDelegate.lock. But in
       * fact we are holding it because it is the same as this.lock, which we know we are holding,
       * thanks to @GuardedBy above. (cancellationDelegate.lock is initialized to this.lock in the
       * call to `new SupplantableFuture` below.)

   *
   * <p>Historically, {@code Converter} instances in this library have implemented this method to
   * recognize certain cases where distinct {@code Converter} instances would in fact behave
   * identically. However, this is not true of {@code Converter} implementations in general. It is
   * best not to depend on it.
   */
  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {

        }
        return toReturn;
      }

      @GuardedBy("lock")
      /*
       * The GuardedBy checker warns us that we're not holding cancellationDelegate.lock. But in
       * fact we are holding it because it is the same as this.lock, which we know we are holding,
       * thanks to @GuardedBy above. (cancellationDelegate.lock is initialized to this.lock in the
       * call to `new SupplantableFuture` below.)

    List<Integer> fromList = new LinkedList<>(SOME_SEQUENTIAL_LIST);
    List<String> list = transform(fromList, SOME_FUNCTION);
    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */

   * actually remain in the file, something that it {@linkplain java.io.FileInputStream#skip(long)
   * specifies} it can do in its Javadoc despite the fact that it is violating the contract of
   * {@code InputStream.skip()}.
   */
  private static long skipSafely(InputStream in, long n) throws IOException {
    int available = in.available();

"deles", "desde", "deste", "do", "dos", "dun", "duns", "dunha", "dunhas", "e", "el", "ela", "elas", "eles", "en", "era", "eran", "esa", "esas", "ese", "eses", "esta", "estar", "estaba", "está", "están", "este", "estes", "estiven", "estou", "eu", "é", "facer", "foi", "foron", "fun", "había", "hai", "iso", "isto", "la", "las", "lle", "lles", "lo", "los", "mais", "me", "meu", "meus", "min", "miña", "miñas", "moi", "na", "nas", "neste", "nin", "no", "non", "nos", "nosa", "nosas", "noso", "nosos", "nós", "nun",...

"deles", "desde", "deste", "do", "dos", "dun", "duns", "dunha", "dunhas", "e", "el", "ela", "elas", "eles", "en", "era", "eran", "esa", "esas", "ese", "eses", "esta", "estar", "estaba", "está", "están", "este", "estes", "estiven", "estou", "eu", "é", "facer", "foi", "foron", "fun", "había", "hai", "iso", "isto", "la", "las", "lle", "lles", "lo", "los", "mais", "me", "meu", "meus", "min", "miña", "miñas", "moi", "na", "nas", "neste", "nin", "no", "non", "nos", "nosa", "nosas", "noso", "nosos", "nós", "nun",...

          break;
        }
      }
    }
  }

  /*
   * Methods that loop waiting on a guard's condition until the guard is satisfied, while recording
   * this fact so that other threads know to check our guard and signal us. It's caller's
   * responsibility to ensure that the guard is *not* currently satisfied.
   */

  @GuardedBy("lock")

    // way for it to return a false negative would be for the target value to jump around in the map
    // such that none of the subsequent iterations observed it, despite the fact that at every point
    // in time it was present somewhere int the map. This becomes increasingly unlikely as
    // CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES increases, though without locking it is theoretically possible.