import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A class that can supply objects of a single type; a pre-Java-8 version of {@link
 * java.util.function.Supplier java.util.function.Supplier}. Semantically, this could be a factory,
 * generator, builder, closure, or something else entirely. No guarantees are implied by this
 * interface.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Suppliers} class provides common suppliers and related utilities.
 *

 *  Fix: Don't crash if a TLS tunnel's response body is truncated.
 *  Fix: Don't track unusable routes beyond their usefulness. We had a bug where we could track
    certain bad routes indefinitely; now we only track the ones that could be necessary.
 *  Fix: Defer proxy selection until a proxy is required. This saves calls to `ProxySelector` on
    calls that use a pooled connection.


## Version 4.3.1

    /**
     * Return the sAMAccountName of this SID unless it could not
     * be resolved in which case the numeric RID is returned. If this
     * SID is a domain SID, this method will return an empty String.
     *
     * @return the account name
     */
    String getAccountName();

    /**
     * Return the domain name of this SID unless it could not be

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Legacy version of {@link java.util.function.Supplier java.util.function.Supplier}. Semantically,
 * this could be a factory, generator, builder, closure, or something else entirely. No guarantees
 * are implied by this interface.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Suppliers} class provides common suppliers and related utilities.
 *

And also that you are not sending any data that should have been filtered by a `response_model`.

///

### More info { #more-info }

/// note | Technical Details

You could also use `from starlette.responses import Response` or `from starlette.responses import JSONResponse`.

          // caught and forwarded to the service the task would stop executing but the service would
          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

      }
      // We could delegate to super now but it would still box too much
      if (!(object instanceof List)) {
        return false;
      }
      List<?> that = (List<?>) object;
      if (this.size() != that.size()) {
        return false;
      }
      int i = parent.start;
      // Since `that` is very likely RandomAccess we could avoid allocating this iterator...

      }
      // We could delegate to super now but it would still box too much
      if (!(object instanceof List)) {
        return false;
      }
      List<?> that = (List<?>) object;
      if (this.size() != that.size()) {
        return false;
      }
      int i = parent.start;
      // Since `that` is very likely RandomAccess we could avoid allocating this iterator...

   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work
   *     }
   *   }
   * </pre>
   *
   * <p>...or you could respond to stop requests by implementing {@link #triggerShutdown()}, which