@CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public final <A extends Appendable> A appendTo(A appendable, @Nullable Object[] parts)
      throws IOException {
    @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO: b/316358623 - Remove suppression after fixing checker
    List<?> partsList = Arrays.<@Nullable Object>asList(parts);
    return appendTo(appendable, partsList);
  }

  /** Appends to {@code appendable} the string representation of each of the remaining arguments. */

      @Override
      public @Nullable Object[] toArray() {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this);
      }

      @Override
      @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
      public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this, a);
      }

      @Override
      public Spliterator<K> spliterator() {

        fw.println("#");
        fw.println("# The checker does not handle implicit section names, so they must be explicit and declared as: [[section-name]]");
        fw.println("#");
        fw.println("# The checker also rejects Markdown-style links, such as [text](https://example.com/something) as they do not render properly");

    }

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public final <A extends Appendable> A appendTo(A appendable, @Nullable Object[] parts)
      throws IOException {
    @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO: b/316358623 - Remove suppression after fixing checker
    List<?> partsList = Arrays.<@Nullable Object>asList(parts);
    return appendTo(appendable, partsList);
  }

  /** Appends to {@code appendable} the string representation of each of the remaining arguments. */

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},