[19511] [INFO] Started server process [19511]
[19511] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19511] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19513] [INFO] Started server process [19513]
[19513] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19513] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19514] [INFO] Started server process [19514]
[19514] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19514] [INFO] Application startup complete.

		panic("Failed to acquire read lock")
	}
	// fmt.Println("1st read lock acquired, waiting...")

	if !lrwm.GetRLock(ctx, "", "object1", time.Second) {
		panic("Failed to acquire read lock")
	}
	// fmt.Println("2nd read lock acquired, waiting...")

	go func() {
		time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
		lrwm.RUnlock()
		// fmt.Println("1st read lock released, waiting...")
	}()

	go func() {
		time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
		lrwm.RUnlock()

<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Started reloader process [28720]
<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Started server process [28722]
<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Waiting for application startup.
<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Application startup complete.
```

</div>

⚫️ **🏆 💡** 👈 👆 ✍ ⚖️ 📁 📟, ✍ ⚫️ &amp; 🏃 ⚫️ 🌐.

   *
   * @return the head of the request queue
   */
  @Throws(InterruptedException::class)
  fun takeRequest(): RecordedRequest = requestQueue.take()

  /**
   * Awaits the next HTTP request (waiting up to the specified wait time if necessary), removes it,
   * and returns it. Callers should use this to verify the request was sent as intended within the
   * given time.
   *

    TimeoutException e =
        assertThrows(
            TimeoutException.class, () -> service.startAsync().awaitRunning(1, MILLISECONDS));
    assertThat(e)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("Timed out waiting for Foo [STARTING] to reach the RUNNING state.");
  }

  private class FakeService extends AbstractExecutionThreadService implements TearDown {

      if (compareAndSet(currentRunner, blocker)) {
        // Thread.interrupt can throw arbitrary exceptions due to the nio InterruptibleChannel API
        // This will make sure that tasks don't get stuck busy waiting.
        // Some of this is fixed in jdk11 (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198692) but
        // not all.  See the test cases for examples on how this can happen.
        try {

 * in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License
 * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express

[19511] [INFO] Started server process [19511]
[19511] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19511] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19513] [INFO] Started server process [19513]
[19513] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19513] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19514] [INFO] Started server process [19514]
[19514] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19514] [INFO] Application startup complete.

[19511] [INFO] Started server process [19511]
[19511] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19511] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19513] [INFO] Started server process [19513]
[19513] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19513] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19514] [INFO] Started server process [19514]
[19514] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19514] [INFO] Application startup complete.

            // so when oldFuture completes it is safe to allow the next submitted task to
            // proceed. Doing this immediately here lets the next task run without waiting for
            // the cancelled task's executor to run the noop AsyncCallable.
            //
            // ---
            //