a = Arrays.<@Nullable Integer>asList(4, 8, 15, null, 23, 42);
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(a, b));
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b, a));

    // Different lengths.
    a = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23);
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(a, b));
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b, a));
  }

  public void testToString() {

- Kubelet: the HostPort implementation in dockershim was not taking into consideration the HostIP field, causing that the same HostPort can not be used with different IP addresses.
  This bug causes the conformance test "HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol" to fail. ([#98838](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98838), [@aojea](https://github.com/aojea)) [SIG Network and Node]

      // If a and b have different signs or a has the same sign as the result then there was no
      // overflow, return.
      return naiveSum;
    }
    // we did over/under flow, if the sign is negative we should return MAX otherwise MIN
    return Long.MAX_VALUE + ((naiveSum >>> (Long.SIZE - 1)) ^ 1);
  }

  /**

  * Allow configuration of a single security group for ELBs ([#45500](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45500), [@nbutton23](https://github.com/nbutton23))

  * Fix support running the master with a different AWS account or even on a different cloud provider than the nodes. ([#44235](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/44235), [@mrIncompetent](https://github.com/mrIncompetent))

  `0`s, and IPv4-mapped IPv6 values (e.g. `::ffff:192.168.0.1`) are forbidden.
  These sorts of values can potentially cause security problems when different
  components interpret the same string as referring to different IP addresses
  (as in CVE-2021-29923).
  
  This tightening applies only to fields in built-in API kinds, and not to
  custom resource kinds, values in Kubernetes configuration files, or

- Added driver-owned fields in `ResourceSlice` to mark whether the device was shareable among multiple resource claims (or requests) and to specify how each capacity could be shared between different requests.
  - Added user-owned fields in `ResourceClaim` to specify resource requirements against each device capacity.

      .assertCode(200)
      .assertBody("A")
    val request1ReceivedAt = System.currentTimeMillis()
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().headers["If-None-Match"]).isNull()

    // Hit that stored response. It's different, but Vary says it doesn't matter.
    Thread.sleep(10) // Make sure the timestamps are unique.
    val cacheHit =
      executeSynchronously(
        "/",
        "Accept-Language",
        "en-US",

 *
 * <pre>
 * LockA -&gt; LockB -&gt; LockC
 * LockA -&gt; LockC -&gt; LockB
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p><strong>ReadWriteLocks</strong>
 *
 * <p>While {@code ReadWriteLock} instances have different properties and can form cycles without
 * potential deadlock, this class treats {@code ReadWriteLock} instances as equivalent to
 * traditional exclusive locks. Although this increases the false positives that the locks detect

* Add note to docs: [Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix`](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/bigger-applications/#include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix). PR [#348](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/348).

* Fix OpenAPI/JSON Schema generation for two functions with the same name (in different modules) with the same composite bodies.

     * ImmutableSortedSet#orderedBy}.
     */
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): use Object[] instead of E[] in the mainline? (The backport is different and
     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we