Если ранее вы использовали другой асинхронный фреймворк, который работает иначе,
и привыкли объявлять простые вычислительные *функции* через `def` ради
незначительного прироста скорости (порядка 100 наносекунд), обратите внимание,
что с **FastAPI** вы получите противоположный эффект. В таком случае больше подходит
`async def`, если только *функция обработки пути* не использует код, приводящий

servidor).

Se você está chegando de outro framework assíncrono que não faz o trabalho descrito acima e você está acostumado a definir triviais *funções de operação de rota* com simples `def` para ter um mínimo ganho de performance (cerca de 100 nanosegundos), por favor observe que no **FastAPI** o efeito pode ser bem o oposto. Nesses casos, é melhor usar `async def` a menos que suas *funções de operação de rota* utilizem código que performem bloqueamento <abbr title="Input/Output: disco lendo...

    InetAddress ipv4 = InetAddresses.forString("1.2.3.4");
    ImmutableSet<String> validIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(
            "2001:db8::5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::100:5efe:102:304", // Private Multicast? Not likely.
            "2001:db8::200:5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::300:5efe:102:304" // Public Multicast? Also unlikely.
            );

diesem Fall könnte es besser sein, nur zwei Server zu haben und einen höheren Prozentsatz von deren Ressourcen zu nutzen (CPU, Arbeitsspeicher, Festplatte, Netzwerkbandbreite, usw.).

Wenn Sie andererseits über zwei Server verfügen und **100 % ihrer CPU und ihres RAM** nutzen, wird irgendwann ein Prozess nach mehr Speicher fragen und der Server muss die Festplatte als „Speicher“ verwenden (was tausendmal langsamer sein kann) oder er könnte sogar **abstürzen**. Oder ein Prozess muss möglicherweise...

					peersLogOnceIf(ctx, err, addr.String())
				}

				// Wait for a minimum of 100ms and dynamically increase this based on number of attempts.
				if i < retryCount-1 {
					time.Sleep(100*time.Millisecond + time.Duration(r.Float64()*float64(time.Second)))
					continue
				}
			}
			break
		}
	}()
}

// DeletePolicy - deletes policy across all peers.

      return delegate;
    }
    return new UnmodifiableMultimap<>(delegate);
  }

  /**
   * Simply returns its argument.
   *
   * @deprecated no need to use this
   * @since 10.0
   */
  @Deprecated
  public static <K, V> Multimap<K, V> unmodifiableMultimap(ImmutableMultimap<K, V> delegate) {
    return checkNotNull(delegate);
  }

çağrılmak yerine (sunucuyu bloke edeceğinden) daha sonra beklenen harici bir iş parçacığı havuzunda çalıştırılır.

Yukarıda açıklanan şekilde çalışmayan başka bir asenkron framework'den geliyorsanız ve küçük bir performans kazancı (yaklaşık 100 nanosaniye) için  "def" ile *path fonksiyonu* tanımlamaya alışkınsanız, **FastAPI**'de tam tersi olacağını unutmayın. Bu durumlarda, *path fonksiyonu* <abbr title="Input/Output: disk okuma veya yazma, ağ iletişimleri.">G/Ç</abbr> engelleyen durum oluşturmadıkça...

		v, err := strconv.Atoi(lri)
		if err != nil {
			panic(err)
		}
		lockRetryMinInterval = time.Duration(v) * time.Millisecond
	}

	lockRetryBackOff = backoffWait(
		lockRetryMinInterval,
		100*time.Millisecond,
		5*time.Second,
	)
}

func log(format string, data ...interface{}) {
	if dsyncLog {
		console.Printf(format, data...)
	}
}

const (

s := make([]int, 1e3)           // slice with len(s) == cap(s) == 1000
s := make([]int, 1<<63)         // illegal: len(s) is not representable by a value of type int
s := make([]int, 10, 0)         // illegal: len(s) > cap(s)
c := make(chan int, 10)         // channel with a buffer size of 10
m := make(map[string]int, 100)  // map with initial space for approximately 100 elements

        if (text == null || fromText == null || toText == null) {
            return null;
        }
        final StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder(100);
        int pos = 0;
        int pos2 = 0;
        while (true) {
            pos = text.indexOf(fromText, pos2);
            if (pos == 0) {
                buf.append(toText);