Da die Swagger-Benutzeroberfläche derzeit nicht mehrere JSON Schema Beispiele unterstützt (Stand: 26.08.2023), hatten Benutzer keine Möglichkeit, mehrere Beispiele in der Dokumentation anzuzeigen.

Um dieses Problem zu lösen, hat FastAPI `0.103.0` **Unterstützung** für die Deklaration desselben alten **OpenAPI-spezifischen** `examples`-Felds mit dem neuen Parameter `openapi_examples` hinzugefügt. 🤓

### Zusammenfassung { #summary }

                return session;
            }
            newSession = new DefaultRepositorySystemSession(session);
        } else {
            newSession = new DefaultRepositorySystemSession(h -> false); // no close handle used
        }

        final LocalRepositoryManager llrm =
                system.newLocalRepositoryManager(newSession, new LocalRepository(repository.getBasedir()));

            // Each extract will overwrite the top level classes that existed before it, the result is that we end up
            // with a single version of the class in `jarExpandDir`.
            // This will be the closes version to `targetCompatibility`, the same class that would be loaded in a JVM
            // that has `targetCompatibility` version.

			rows, err := db.Statement.ConnPool.QueryContext(db.Statement.Context, db.Statement.SQL.String(), db.Statement.Vars...)
			if err != nil {
				db.AddError(err)
				return
			}
			defer func() {
				db.AddError(rows.Close())
			}()
			gorm.Scan(rows, db, 0)

			if db.Statement.Result != nil {
				db.Statement.Result.RowsAffected = db.RowsAffected
			}
		}
	}
}

func BuildQuerySQL(db *gorm.DB) {

		err = func() (err error) {
			defer zippedFile.Close()
			extractedFilePath := filepath.Join(targetDir, file.Name)
			if file.FileInfo().IsDir() {
				return os.MkdirAll(extractedFilePath, file.Mode())
			}
			outputFile, err := os.OpenFile(extractedFilePath, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_CREATE|os.O_TRUNC, file.Mode())
			if err != nil {
				return err
			}
			defer outputFile.Close()
			_, err = io.Copy(outputFile, zippedFile)

			batchLogIf(ctx, ri.updateAfter(ctx, api, after, job))
			cancel()
		}
	}()

	expireCh := make(chan []expireObjInfo, workerSize)
	expireDoneCh := make(chan struct{})
	go func() {
		defer close(expireDoneCh)
		batchObjsForDelete(ctx, r, ri, job, api, wk, expireCh)
	}()

	var (
		prevObj       ObjectInfo
		matchedFilter BatchJobExpireFilter
		versionsCount int
		toDel         []expireObjInfo

  CHECK_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status)) << TF_Message(status);
  TFE_Op* cloned = CloneOp(original_var_op);

  EXPECT_EQ("/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:CPU:0",
            std::string(TFE_OpGetDevice(cloned, status)));
  CHECK_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status)) << TF_Message(status);
  EXPECT_EQ("VarHandleOp", std::string(TFE_OpGetName(cloned, status)));
  CHECK_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status)) << TF_Message(status);

	public final fun boundary ()Ljava/lang/String;
	public fun close ()V
	public final fun nextPart ()Lokhttp3/MultipartReader$Part;
}

public final class okhttp3/MultipartReader$Part : java/io/Closeable {
	public fun <init> (Lokhttp3/Headers;Lokio/BufferedSource;)V
	public final fun body ()Lokio/BufferedSource;
	public fun close ()V
	public final fun headers ()Lokhttp3/Headers;
}

				w.Header()[xhttp.AmzDeleteMarker] = []string{strconv.FormatBool(gr.ObjInfo.DeleteMarker)}
			}
		}
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}
	defer gr.Close()
	srcInfo := gr.ObjInfo

	actualPartSize, err := srcInfo.GetActualSize()
	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C [(all thanks to Starlette)](https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1).

### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }