if (wasAlreadyInterrupted) {
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
      }
      return result;
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
      // better than `end > System.nanoTime()` because `System.nanoTime()` could wrap around
      return end - System.nanoTime() > 0;
    }
  }

  /** Invokes {@code toJoin.}{@link Thread#join() join()} uninterruptibly. */

    }
  }

  /*
   * We've split testFuzzyCompare() into multiple tests so that our internal Android test runner has
   * a better chance of completing each within its per-test-method timeout.
   */

  public void testFuzzyCompare0() {
    runTestFuzzyCompare(0);
  }

  public void testFuzzyCompare1() {
    runTestFuzzyCompare(1);

Esse desacoplamento de partes, e ser um "microframework" que pode ser estendido para cobrir exatamente o que é necessário era uma funcionalidade chave que eu queria manter.

Dada a simplicidade do Flask, ele parecia uma boa opção para construção de APIs. A próxima coisa a encontrar era um "Django REST Framework" para Flask.

/// check | Inspirou o **FastAPI** a

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">
</a>

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">
</a>

    sort(insertionOrder, entryComparator(keyComparator));
    return insertionOrder;
  }

  /**
   * Compares strings in natural order except that null comes immediately before a given value. This
   * works better than Ordering.natural().nullsFirst() because, if null comes before all other
   * values, it lies outside the submap/submultiset ranges we test, and the variety of tests that
   * exercise null handling fail on those subcollections.

하지만 다음에서 이를 개선하는 방법을 보여드리겠습니다. 🤓

## 커스텀 Operation ID와 더 나은 메서드 이름 { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

클라이언트에서 **더 단순한 메서드 이름**을 갖도록, operation ID가 **생성되는 방식**을 **수정**할 수 있습니다.

이 경우 operation ID가 다른 방식으로도 **유일**하도록 보장해야 합니다.

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of entries added to the builder.

        int i;

        /*
         * Compare 8 bytes at a time. Benchmarking on x86 shows a stride of 8 bytes is no slower
         * than 4 bytes even on 32-bit. On the other hand, it is substantially faster on 64-bit.
         */
        for (i = 0; i < strideLimit; i += stride) {
          long lw = theUnsafe.getLong(left, BYTE_ARRAY_BASE_OFFSET + (long) i);

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">
</a>