*
     * @return RDMA provider name ("auto", "disni", "tcp", etc.)
     */
    String getRdmaProvider();

    /**
     * Get RDMA read/write threshold
     *
     * Operations larger than this size will use RDMA read/write
     * instead of send/receive.
     *
     * @return threshold in bytes
     */
    int getRdmaReadWriteThreshold();

    /**
     * Get maximum RDMA send size

        // Then
        assertTrue(smb2Only, "Should delegate SMB2 only negotiation");
        assertFalse(secureNegotiate, "Should delegate secure negotiate requirement");
        assertTrue(ntlmTargetName, "Should delegate NTLM target name setting");
        assertFalse(port139Failover, "Should delegate port 139 failover setting");
        assertTrue(dfsStrictView, "Should delegate DFS strict view setting");

  }

  public void testCapacityForNegativeSizeFails() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> Maps.capacity(-1));
  }

  /**
   * Tests that nHMWES makes hash maps large enough that adding the expected number of elements
   * won't cause a rehash.
   *
   * <p>As of jdk7u40, HashMap has an empty-map optimization. The argument to new HashMap(int) is

   * is {@code 60}, and the concurrency level is {@code 8}, then eight segments are created, each
   * having a hash table of size eight. Providing a large enough estimate at construction time
   * avoids the need for expensive resizing operations later, but setting this value unnecessarily
   * high wastes memory.
   *

        generator.setCommandTimeout(0L);
        assertTrue(true);

        // Test negative timeout
        generator.setCommandTimeout(-1L);
        assertTrue(true);

        // Test very large timeout
        generator.setCommandTimeout(Long.MAX_VALUE);
        assertTrue(true);

        // Test destroy timeout
        generator.setCommandDestroyTimeout(0L);
        assertTrue(true);

      }

      for (EndpointPair<N> endpoints : sanityCheckSet(graph.incidentEdges(node))) {
        if (graph.isDirected()) {
          assertThat(graph.hasEdgeConnecting(endpoints.source(), endpoints.target())).isTrue();
        } else {
          assertThat(graph.hasEdgeConnecting(endpoints.nodeU(), endpoints.nodeV())).isTrue();
        }
      }
    }

    sanityCheckSet(graph.edges());

	opts.ReplicationSourceTaggingTimestamp = taggingtimestmp
	opts.PreserveETag = etag

	return opts, nil
}

// get ObjectOptions for Copy calls with encryption headers provided on the target side and source side metadata
func copyDstOpts(ctx context.Context, r *http.Request, bucket, object string, metadata map[string]string) (opts ObjectOptions, err error) {
	return putOptsFromReq(ctx, r, bucket, object, metadata)
}

* kube-apiserver: a request body of a CREATE/UPDATE/PATCH/DELETE resource operation larger than 100 MB will return a 413 "request entity too large" error. ([#73805](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/73805), [@caesarxuchao](https://github.com/caesarxuchao))

        }
        // Verify reindex targets are original names (not .rebuild.xxx)
        for (final String[] pair : testClient.reindexPairs) {
            assertFalse(pair[1].contains(".rebuild."), "Reindex target should not contain .rebuild.: " + pair[1]);
        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_reindexConfigIndices_deletesOldBeforeRecreate() {
        testClient.existsIndexResult = true;

 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the
 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).