- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 81 - 90 of 1,826 for we (0.02 sec)
-
okhttp-osgi-tests/build.gradle.kts
the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on the generated index.xml, are outputs, not inputs. We can be sure of this because they are deleted in the @BeforeEach method of the OsgiTest test class. - To enable the benefit of incremental builds, we can ask Gradle to ignore these two files when considering whether the classpath
Registered: Fri Sep 05 11:42:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Aug 01 08:17:18 UTC 2025 - 2.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
compat/maven-compat/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/project/inheritance/t03/ProjectInheritanceTest.java
* the final model of the project being assembled. There is no * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test: * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values * down in the lineage are bubbling up where they should. * */ @Deprecated @SuppressWarnings("checkstyle:UnusedLocalVariable")
Registered: Sun Sep 07 03:35:12 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Mar 21 04:56:21 UTC 2025 - 2.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/response-model.md
But in most of the cases where we need to do something like this, we want the model just to **filter/remove** some of the data as in this example.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 07:19:17 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:15:41 UTC 2025 - 16K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/LockHeldAssertingSet.java
* * Similarly, we avoid having those methods *implemented* in terms of *other* TestSet methods * that will perform holdsLock assertions: * * - For iterator(), we can accomplish that by not overriding iterator() at all. That way, we * inherit an implementation that forwards to the delegate collection, which performs no
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Feb 13 17:34:21 UTC 2025 - 4.3K bytes - Viewed (0) -
okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/concurrent/TaskRunner.kt
private var coordinatorWakeUpAt = 0L /** * When we need a new thread to run tasks, we call [Backend.execute]. A few microseconds later we * expect a newly-started thread to call [Runnable.run]. We shouldn't request new threads until * the already-requested ones are in service, otherwise we might create more threads than we need. * * We use [executeCallCount] and [runCallCount] to defend against starting more threads than we
Registered: Fri Sep 05 11:42:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Aug 30 11:30:11 UTC 2025 - 10.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/AbstractTransformFuture.java
* StackOverflowError: We can't reliably call setException(error). * * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Feb 20 18:03:37 UTC 2025 - 10.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/reflect/Types.java
} /* * We use this only when getTypeName is available. * * Well, really, we use this when we think we're running under Java 8, as determined by some * logic in the static initializer, which does not check for getTypeName specifically. We * should really validate that it works as desired for all Android versions that we support. */ @IgnoreJRERequirement
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Sep 03 14:03:14 UTC 2025 - 23.6K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/base/SneakyThrows.java
* calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call. * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}. * * <p>We sometimes also use {@code sneakyThrow} for testing how our code responds to
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Mon Feb 03 21:52:39 UTC 2025 - 2.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/SneakyThrows.java
* calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call. * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}. * * <p>We sometimes also use {@code sneakyThrow} for testing how our code responds to
Registered: Fri Sep 05 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Mon Dec 30 18:44:22 UTC 2024 - 2.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
src/test/java/jcifs/smb1/smb1/TransTransactNamedPipeResponseTest.java
MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this); // We need to manually inject the mock as we are not using @InjectMocks on the constructor response = new TransTransactNamedPipeResponse(mockPipe); } /** * Tests the constructor of {@link TransTransactNamedPipeResponse}. */ @Test void testConstructor() { // The constructor is called in setUp(), so we just verify the result.
Registered: Sun Sep 07 00:10:21 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Aug 14 05:31:44 UTC 2025 - 5.3K bytes - Viewed (0)