// For now, we test that the method signature is correct and can be called

        AtomicInteger callbackCount = new AtomicInteger(0);

        try {
            // This will likely fail due to missing SearchEngineClient setup,
            // but we can verify the method signature and basic functionality
            SearchEngineUtil.scroll("test_index", hit -> {

        // Assert
        assertTrue(result, "Verify should return true for valid signature");
        verify(signingDigest, times(1)).verify(testData, offset, length, extraPad, message);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test verify method returns false for invalid signature")
    void testVerifyReturnsFalse() {
        // Arrange
        int offset = 0;
        int length = testData.length;

xlHeaderVersion version == 1:

```
//msgp:tuple xlMetaV2VersionHeader
type xlMetaV2VersionHeader struct {
 VersionID [16]byte  // Version UUID, raw.
 ModTime   int64     // Unix nanoseconds.
 Signature [4]byte   // Signature of metadata.
 Type      uint8     // Type if the version
 Flags     uint8
}
```

The following flags are defined:

```
const (
 FreeVersion = 1 << 0
 UsesDataDir = 1 << 1

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

  if (TF_GetCode(status) != TF_OK) return;

  tensorflow::GradientDef gdef;
  gdef.set_function_name(func->record->fdef().signature().name());
  gdef.set_gradient_func(grad->record->fdef().signature().name());
  status->status = g->graph.AddGradientDef(std::move(gdef));
}

int TF_GraphNumFunctions(TF_Graph* g) {
  tensorflow::mutex_lock l(g->mu);

                    12:8b
        X509v3 extensions:
            X509v3 Key Usage: critical
                Digital Signature
            X509v3 Extended Key Usage: 
                TLS Web Client Authentication
            X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical
                CA:FALSE
    Signature Algorithm: ED25519
         7e:aa:be:ed:47:4d:b9:2f:fc:ed:7f:5a:fc:6b:c0:05:5b:f5:

   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Could this be simplified if we modified implementations of LegacyConverter to
   * override methods (probably called "unsafeDoForward" and "unsafeDoBackward") with the same
   * signatures as the methods below, rather than overriding the same doForward and doBackward
   * methods as implementations of normal converters do?
   *

      }
      return builder.build();
    }
  }

  private static final class Signature {
    private final String name;
    private final ImmutableList<Class<?>> parameterTypes;

    Signature(Method method) {
      this(method.getName(), ImmutableList.copyOf(method.getParameterTypes()));
    }

    Signature(String name, ImmutableList<Class<?>> parameterTypes) {
      this.name = name;

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,

    }

    /**
     * Returns the string representation of the method signature.
     *
     * @param methodName
     *            The method name. Cannot be {@literal null} or empty
     * @param argTypes
     *            The argument types
     * @return The string representation of the method signature
     */
    public static String getSignature(final String methodName, final Class<?>... argTypes) {