@Mock
    private SmbFile mockFile1;

    @Mock
    private SmbFile mockFile2;

    private DirectoryLeaseManager directoryLeaseManager;
    private AutoCloseable mocks;

    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() {
        mocks = MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
        when(context.getConfig()).thenReturn(config);
        when(config.isDirectoryNotificationsEnabled()).thenReturn(false); // Disable for unit tests

	"github.com/minio/mux"
)

// adminErasureTestBed - encapsulates subsystems that need to be setup for
// admin-handler unit tests.
type adminErasureTestBed struct {
	erasureDirs []string
	objLayer    ObjectLayer
	router      *mux.Router
	done        context.CancelFunc
}

// prepareAdminErasureTestBed - helper function that setups a single-node
// Erasure backend for admin-handler tests.

is decided by how `domain.com` gets resolved, if there is a round-robin DNS on `domain.com` then
it is randomized which cluster might provision the bucket.

### 3. Test your setup

To test this setup, access the MinIO server via browser or [`mc`](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/reference/minio-mc.html#quickstart). You’ll see the uploaded files are accessible from the all the MinIO endpoints.

/**
 * @author shinsuke
 *
 */
public class SitemapsRuleTest extends PlainTestCase {
    public SitemapsRule sitemapsRule;

    @Override
    protected void setUp() throws Exception {
        super.setUp();
        StandardCrawlerContainer container = new StandardCrawlerContainer().singleton("sitemapsHelper", SitemapsHelper.class)//
                .singleton("sitemapsRule", SitemapsRule.class);

        this.roleHint = roleHint;
    }

    // TestCase methods -------------------------------------------------------

    /*
     * @see junit.framework.TestCase#setUp()
     */
    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() throws Exception {
        conflictResolver = (ConflictResolver) container.lookup(ConflictResolver.ROLE, roleHint);

        a1 = createArtifact("a", "1.0");
        a2 = createArtifact("a", "2.0");

  }

  public G getSubjectGenerator() {
    return subjectGenerator;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B withSetUp(Runnable setUp) {
    this.setUp = setUp;
    return self();
  }

  public Runnable getSetUp() {
    return setUp;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B withTearDown(Runnable tearDown) {
    this.tearDown = tearDown;
    return self();
  }

  public Runnable getTearDown() {

Yes, MinIO will try to transparently migrate any existing IAM data and either stores
it in plaintext (no KMS) or re-encrypts using the KMS.

> Is this change backward compatible? Will it break my setup?

This change is not backward compatible for all setups. In particular, the native
Hashicorp Vault integration - which has been deprecated already - won't be
supported anymore. KES is now mandatory if a third-party KMS should be used.

    @Mock
    private Address address;

    @Mock
    private Smb2NegotiateResponse negotiateResponse;

    private SmbTransportImpl transport;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() throws Exception {
        when(context.getConfig()).thenReturn(config);
        when(config.isSigningEnforced()).thenReturn(false);
        when(config.getSessionTimeout()).thenReturn(30_000);

    @Mock
    private SmbTransport transport;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
        // Setup transport fields that are accessed directly
        transport.tconHostName = "testHost";
        // Setup session.transport field (accessed directly in SmbTree)
        session.transport = transport;
        // Setup session to return transport via method call

		}

		// create some test data
		setup, err := newErasureTestSetup(t, test.dataBlocks, test.disks-test.dataBlocks, test.blocksize)
		if err != nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d: failed to setup Erasure environment: %v", i, err)
		}
		disks := setup.disks
		erasure, err := NewErasure(t.Context(), test.dataBlocks, test.disks-test.dataBlocks, test.blocksize)
		if err != nil {