/// Enable keep-alive
			{
				_ = unix.SetsockoptInt(fd, unix.SOL_SOCKET, unix.SO_KEEPALIVE, 1)

				// The time (in seconds) the connection needs to remain idle before
				// TCP starts sending keepalive probes
				_ = syscall.SetsockoptInt(fd, syscall.IPPROTO_TCP, syscall.TCP_KEEPIDLE, 15)

				// Number of probes.

     * the edge away because that dependency is not within the set of projects
     * we are trying to build. we assume a closed set.</li>
     * <li>do a topo sort on the graph that remains.</li>
     * </ul>
     * @throws DuplicateProjectException if any projects are duplicated by id
     */
    // MAVENAPI FIXME: the DAG used is NOT only used to represent the dependency relation,

useful?

Erasure code protects data from multiple drives failure, unlike RAID or replication. For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects...

        if (dstIndex + this.dataLength > dst.length) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                    String.format("Data exceeds buffer size ( remain buffer: %d data length: %d)", dst.length - dstIndex, this.dataLength));
        }

        System.arraycopy(this.data, this.dataOffset, dst, dstIndex, this.dataLength);
        dstIndex += this.dataLength;

        assertEquals(secondResult, thirdResult);

        // Rule ID should remain constant
        String id1 = rule.getRuleId();
        String id2 = rule.getRuleId();
        String id3 = rule.getRuleId();

        assertEquals(id1, id2);
        assertEquals(id2, id3);

        // Processor should remain the same instance
        ResponseProcessor proc1 = rule.getResponseProcessor();

        // Read one byte to trigger message header processing
        assertEquals(1, sis.read());

        // 3 bytes should remain available in current message
        assertEquals(3, sis.available());

        // Read another byte
        assertEquals(2, sis.read());

        // 2 bytes should remain
        assertEquals(2, sis.available());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Multiple messages are read sequentially")

            // This is consistent with the actual implementation behavior
            // The reserved bytes remain as they were in the buffer
            for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
                assertEquals((byte) 0xFF, buffer[startIndex + SOURCE_KEY_SIZE + 4 + i],
                        "Reserved byte at position " + i + " should remain unchanged");
            }
        }

        @Test

        authenticator.secureWipePassword();
        authenticator.secureWipePassword();
        authenticator.secureWipePassword();

        assertNull(authenticator.getPassword(), "Password should remain null after multiple wipes");
    }

    // Now process directly from the rest of the input buffer
    while (readBuffer.remaining() >= chunkSize) {
      process(readBuffer);
    }

    // Finally stick the remainder back in our usual buffer
    buffer.put(readBuffer);
    return this;
  }

  /*
   * Note: hashString(CharSequence, Charset) is intentionally not overridden.
   *

  // Modification Operations

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given value is already bound to a different key in this
   *     bimap. The bimap will remain unmodified in this event. To avoid this exception, call {@link
   *     #forcePut} instead.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @Nullable V put(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value);

  /**