Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */

     * Thread2: calls setException(), which returns false, CASes seenExceptionsField to its
     * exception, and wrongly believes that its exception is new (leading it to logging it when it
     * shouldn't)
     *
     * Our solution is for threads to CAS seenExceptionsField from null to a Set populated with _the
     * initial exception_, no matter which thread does the work. This ensures that

    // then FRQ does not bother to load Finalizer.class through a separate ClassLoader. That happens
    // in our test environment, which foils the purpose of this test, so we disable the logic for
    // our test by setting a static field. We are changing the field in the parallel version of FRQ
    // and each test creates its own one of those, so there is no test interference here.

# Not stripping external libraries
fess binary: unstripped-binary-or-object
# Ignore arch dependent warnings, we chose the right libs on start
fess binary: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
# Please check our changelog at https://github.com/codelibs/fess

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with MediumTest or LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>For more discussion, see {@linkplain com.google.common.base.AndroidIncompatible the