* calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

		if err == nil {
			return amzDate, nil
		}
	}
	return time.Time{}, ErrMalformedDate
}

var httpTimeFormats = []string{
	// Do not change this order, http time format dates
	// are usually in http.TimeFormat however there are
	// situations where for example aws-sdk-java doesn't
	// send the correct format.
	http.TimeFormat,
	"Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:04:05 GMT",
}

// ParseHeader parses http.TimeFormat with an acceptable

     * fastest possible implementation, which delegates to the array overload of String.join.
     *
     * In theory, we can quickly determine the size of any Collection. However, thanks to
     * regrettable implementations like our own Sets.filter, Collection.size() is sometimes a
     * linear-time operation, and it can even have side effects. Thus, we limit the special case to

        // win98 observed not returning nativeFileSystem
        // Problems here with iSeries returning ASCII even though useUnicode = true
        // Fortunately we don't really need nativeFileSystem for anything.
        // However, we'll try to read it safely for compatibility
        if (this.byteCount > bufferIndex - start) {
            try {
                // Attempt to read nativeFileSystem, but don't fail if there are issues

       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure
       * exactly what we've benchmarked, and we certainly haven't benchmarked as far back as JDK 8.
       * (We also haven't benchmarked under Android. We continue to use UnsafeAtomicHelper there so

 * a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still runs
 * quickly, since the row key is provided. However, {@code column(columnKey).size()} takes longer,
 * since an iteration across all row keys occurs.
 *
 * <p>Note that this implementation is not synchronized. If multiple threads access this table

 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link