for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra
 * work during upgrades. However it is generally inadvisable for <i>libraries</i> (which get
 * included on users' CLASSPATHs, outside the library developers' control) to do so.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)

E isso mostra seu verdadeiro comprometimento com o FastAPI e sua **comunidade** (você), pois eles não querem apenas fornecer a você um **bom serviço**, mas também querem ter certeza de que você tenha uma **estrutura boa e saudável**, o FastAPI. 🙇

   * however, {@code asMap().get(Object)} returns {@code null} instead of an empty collection.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> The returned map's values are guaranteed to be of type {@link SortedSet}. To
   * obtain this map with the more specific generic type {@code Map<K, SortedSet<V>>}, call {@link
   * Multimaps#asMap(SortedSetMultimap)} instead. <b>However</b>, the returned map <i>itself</i> is

# only need to keep the names, and allow it to be stripped out if
# FinalizableReferenceQueue is unused.
-keepnames class com.google.common.base.internal.Finalizer {
  *** startFinalizer(...);
}
# However, it cannot "spot" that this method needs to be kept IF the class is.
-keepclassmembers class com.google.common.base.internal.Finalizer {
  *** startFinalizer(...);
}
-keepnames class com.google.common.base.FinalizableReference {

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

   * key set contains a key if and only if this multimap maps that key to at least one value.
   *
   * <p>Changes to the returned set will update the underlying multimap, and vice versa. However,
   * <i>adding</i> to the returned set is not possible.
   */
  Set<K> keySet();

  /**
   * Returns a view collection containing the key from each key-value pair in this multimap,

   * symmetry. Moreover, we don't want to reconstruct a native type variable {@code <A>} using our
   * implementation unless some of its bounds have changed in resolution. This avoids creating
   * unequal TypeVariable implementation unnecessarily. When the bounds do change, however, it's
   * fine for the synthetic TypeVariable to be unequal to any native TypeVariable anyway.

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *