if err != nil {
			if tc.expectedError == "" {
				t.Fatalf("[%s] Unexpected error: %v", id, err)
			}
			if err.Error() != tc.expectedError {
				t.Fatalf("[%s] Error returned does not match expectation: %v VS (expected) %v", id, err, tc.expectedError)
			}
			continue
		} else if tc.expectedError != "" {
			t.Fatalf("[%s] GenKeyCert succeeded but expected error: %v", id, tc.expectedError)
		}

//     if ((n % 2) == 0)
//       return testing::AssertionSuccess();
//     else
//       return testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd";
//   }
//
// Then the failed expectation EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(5)))
// will print the message
//
//   Value of: IsEven(Fib(5))
//     Actual: false (5 is odd)
//   Expected: true
//
// instead of a more opaque
//

//     if ((n % 2) == 0)
//       return testing::AssertionSuccess();
//     else
//       return testing::AssertionFailure() << n << " is odd";
//   }
//
// Then the failed expectation EXPECT_TRUE(IsEven(Fib(5)))
// will print the message
//
//   Value of: IsEven(Fib(5))
//     Actual: false (5 is odd)
//   Expected: true
//
// instead of a more opaque
//

			// Since this is a headless service we use podIP to identify the family.
			// This assumes that status.PodIP is assigned correctly (follows pod cidr and
			// pod cidr list order is same as service cidr list order). The expectation is
			// this is *most probably* the case.

			// if the family was incorrectly identified then this will be corrected once the
			// upgrade is completed (controller connects to api-server that correctly defaults services)

							},
						},
					})
				}
				// Don't delete all pods because we confirm that the last pod
				// has exactly one expectation at the end, to verify that we
				// don't double delete.
				for i := range podsToDelete[1:] {
					informers.Core().V1().Pods().Informer().GetIndexer().Delete(podsToDelete[i])

                                    rewriter.getI64Type()),
              permutation));
      reverse_filter_in = filter_transposed;
    }

    // Lets hard-code the reverse indexes to be {0, 1} as the expectation is
    // that the kernel is always in HWOI format, with the above code.
    mhlo::ReverseOp filter = rewriter.create<mhlo::ReverseOp>(
        conv_op.getLoc(), reverse_filter_in, rewriter.getI64TensorAttr({0, 1}));

	"ë":                            "\u00eb",
	"€":                            "\u20ac",
	"!":                            "\u0021",
	"∃":                           "\u2203",
	"ℰ":                     "\u2130",
	"ⅇ":                    "\u2147",
	"≒":                   "\u2252",
	"ф":                             "\u0444",

	// and update the expectations after we've retrieved active pods from the store. If a new pod enters
	// the store after we've checked the expectation, the job sync is just deferred till the next relist.
	satisfiedExpectations := jm.expectations.SatisfiedExpectations(logger, key)

	pods, err := jm.getPodsForJob(ctx, &job)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// know some future addition to the API. Therefore it gets called here
	// even if there is no template to work on, because if some new field
	// gets added, the expectation might be that the controller does
	// something for it.
	claimName, mustCheckOwner, err := resourceclaim.Name(pod, &podClaim)
	switch {
	case errors.Is(err, resourceclaim.ErrClaimNotFound):
		// Continue below.

		"euml;":                            '\U000000EB',
		"euro;":                            '\U000020AC',
		"excl;":                            '\U00000021',
		"exist;":                           '\U00002203',
		"expectation;":                     '\U00002130',
		"exponentiale;":                    '\U00002147',
		"fallingdotseq;":                   '\U00002252',
		"fcy;":                             '\U00000444',