/*
     * Since we use AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper by default, we'll "obviously" use it
     * even when Unsafe isn't available. But it's nice to have a check here to make sure that
     * nothing somehow goes wrong as the JDK restricts access to Unsafe.
     */
    checkHelperVersion(NO_UNSAFE, "AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper");
    /*

///

## Séparer les tests { #separating-tests }

Dans une application réelle, vous auriez probablement vos tests dans un fichier différent.

Et votre application **FastAPI** pourrait aussi être composée de plusieurs fichiers/modules, etc.

### Fichier d’application **FastAPI** { #fastapi-app-file }

Supposons que vous ayez une structure de fichiers comme décrit dans [Applications plus grandes](bigger-applications.md) :

## À propos de la sécurité, des API et des documents { #about-security-apis-and-docs }

Masquer vos interfaces utilisateur des documents en production ne devrait pas être la manière de protéger votre API.

Cela n'ajoute aucune sécurité supplémentaire à votre API, les *chemins d'accès* resteront disponibles là où ils se trouvent.

Mais avant de définir l'option de CLI `--forwarded-allow-ips`, il pourrait rediriger vers `http://localhost:8000/items/`.

Mais peut‑être que votre application est hébergée à `https://mysuperapp.com`, et la redirection devrait être vers `https://mysuperapp.com/items/`.

En définissant `--proxy-headers`, FastAPI pourra désormais rediriger vers l'emplacement correct. 😎

```
https://mysuperapp.com/items/

            listener.transferInitiated(event(session, resource, TransferEvent.EventType.INITIATED));

            Thread.sleep(500); // to make sure queue is processed, cancellation applied

            // subsequent call will cancel
            assertThrows(
                    TransferCancelledException.class,

    # to be read from files and other types, but I'm not even sure it's a good idea
    # to support it as a first class "feature"
    assert is_bytes_sequence_annotation(list[str] | list[bytes])


def test_is_uploadfile_sequence_annotation():
    # For coverage
    # TODO: in theory this would allow declaring types that could be lists of UploadFile
    # and other types, but I'm not even sure it's a good idea to support it as a first

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

| `license_info` | `dict` | Les informations de licence pour l’API exposée. Cela peut contenir plusieurs...

uncaught `Throwable`s or add a shutdown hook
But we're not convinced that all of these things *belong* in the qa directory.
We're fairly sure that tests that require multiple modules or plugins to work
should just pick a "home" plugin. We're fairly sure that the multi-version
tests *do* belong in qa. Beyond that, we're not sure. If you want to add a new
qa project, open a PR and be ready to discuss options.

#### `server`

Additionally, in instructional sentences, prefer the present tense for obligations:

- Prefer `vous devez …` over `vous devrez …`, unless the English source explicitly refers to a future requirement.

- When translating “make sure (that) … is …”, prefer the indicative after `vous assurer que` (e.g. `Vous devez vous assurer qu'il est …`) instead of the subjunctive (e.g. `qu'il soit …`).

### Quotes