Two new interfaces, [TextAppender] and [BinaryAppender], have been
introduced to append the textual or binary representation of an object
to a byte slice. These interfaces provide the same functionality as
[TextMarshaler] and [BinaryMarshaler], but instead of allocating a new slice

be same across the federated deployment, i.e. all the MinIO instances within a federated deployment should use same
etcd back-end.

#### MINIO_DOMAIN

This is the top level domain name used for the federated setup. This domain name should ideally resolve to a load-balancer
running in front of all the federated MinIO instances. The domain name is used to create sub domain entries to etcd. For

# Extra Data Types

Up to now, you have been using common data types, like:

* `int`
* `float`
* `str`
* `bool`

But you can also use more complex data types.

And you will still have the same features as seen up to now:

* Great editor support.
* Data conversion from incoming requests.
* Data conversion for response data.
* Data validation.
* Automatic annotation and documentation.

## Other data types

   * same order. (It is guaranteed to return true for instances constructed from the same values in
   * the same order if {@code strictfp} is in effect, or if the system architecture guarantees
   * {@code strictfp}-like semantics.)
   */
  @Override
  public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object obj) {
    if (obj == null) {
      return false;
    }
    if (getClass() != obj.getClass()) {
      return false;
    }

    // enclosed with same start
    assertEquals(range, range.span(Range.closed(4, 6)));

    // enclosed, interior
    assertEquals(range, range.span(Range.closed(5, 7)));

    // enclosed with same end
    assertEquals(range, range.span(Range.closed(6, 8)));

    // equal
    assertEquals(range, range.span(range));

    // enclosing with same start

  ]
}
```

because the path parameter `item_id` had a value of `"foo"`, which is not an `int`.

The same error would appear if you provided a `float` instead of an `int`, as in: <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/4.2" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/4.2</a>

/// check

So, with the same Python type declaration, **FastAPI** gives you data validation.

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class MapEqualsTester<K, V> extends AbstractMapTester<K, V> {
  public void testEquals_otherMapWithSameEntries() {
    assertTrue(
        "A Map should equal any other Map containing the same entries.",
        getMap().equals(newHashMap(getSampleEntries())));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = CollectionSize.ZERO)
  public void testEquals_otherMapWithDifferentEntries() {

   *       (<i>symmetric</i> property)
   *   <li>If {@code equivalent(x, y)} and {@code equivalent(y, z)} are both true, then {@code
   *       equivalent(x, z)} is also true (<i>transitive</i> property)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that all calls to {@code equivalent(x, y)} are expected to return the same result as
   * long as neither {@code x} nor {@code y} is modified.

 * with the range (if any) that contains a specified key.
 *
 * <p>In contrast to {@link RangeSet}, no "coalescing" is done of {@linkplain
 * Range#isConnected(Range) connected} ranges, even if they are mapped to the same value.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 14.0
 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableRangeMap or TreeRangeMap")
@GwtIncompatible

server to create representative test cases. Or test that your code survives in
awkward-to-reproduce situations like 500 errors or slow-loading responses.


### Example

Use MockWebServer the same way that you use mocking frameworks like
[Mockito](https://github.com/mockito/mockito):

1. Script the mocks.
2. Run application code.
3. Verify that the expected requests were made.

Here's a complete example: