}
                                String line;
                                while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
                                    writer.write(line);
                                }
                            } catch (final Exception e) {

                        try {
                            while (!reader.ready()) {
                                ThreadUtil.sleep(1000L);
                            }
                            command = reader.readLine().trim();
                            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                                logger.debug("Process command: {}", command);
                            }

    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> Files.newReader(null, UTF_8));

    BufferedReader r = Files.newReader(asciiFile, US_ASCII);
    try {
      assertEquals(ASCII, r.readLine());
    } finally {
      r.close();
    }
  }

  public void testNewWriter() throws IOException {
    File temp = createTempFile();

  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

 *       Future} is "completed" even if it is cancelled while its underlying work continues on a
 *       thread, an RPC, etc. The {@code Future} is also "completed" if it fails "early" -- for
 *       example, if the deadline expires on a {@code Future} returned from {@link
 *       Futures#withTimeout} while the {@code Future} it wraps continues its underlying work. So

  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

		opt *sql.TxOptions
		err error
	)

	if len(opts) > 0 {
		opt = opts[0]
	}

	ctx := tx.Statement.Context
	if db.DefaultTransactionTimeout > 0 {
		if _, ok := ctx.Deadline(); !ok {
			ctx, _ = context.WithTimeout(ctx, db.DefaultTransactionTimeout)
		}
	}

	switch beginner := tx.Statement.ConnPool.(type) {
	case TxBeginner:

pkg os, func NewSyscallError(string, error) error
pkg os, func Open(string) (*File, error)
pkg os, func OpenFile(string, int, FileMode) (*File, error)
pkg os, func Pipe() (*File, *File, error)
pkg os, func Readlink(string) (string, error)
pkg os, func Remove(string) error
pkg os, func RemoveAll(string) error
pkg os, func Rename(string, string) error
pkg os, func SameFile(FileInfo, FileInfo) bool

* Fix incorrect conflict errors applying strategic merge patches to resources. ([#43871](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43871), [@liggitt](https://github.com/liggitt))

* Fix init container status reporting when active deadline is exceeded. ([#46305](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/46305), [@sjenning](https://github.com/sjenning))

- github.com/chzyer/logex: [v1.1.10](https://github.com/chzyer/logex/tree/v1.1.10)
- github.com/chzyer/readline: [2972be2](https://github.com/chzyer/readline/tree/2972be2)
- github.com/chzyer/test: [a1ea475](https://github.com/chzyer/test/tree/a1ea475)
- github.com/containerd/cgroups: [0dbf7f0](https://github.com/containerd/cgroups/tree/0dbf7f0)