{"LESS_THAN_1024_B", 0, humanize.KiByte - 1},
	{"BETWEEN_1024B_AND_1_MB", humanize.KiByte, humanize.MiByte - 1},
	{"BETWEEN_1_MB_AND_10_MB", humanize.MiByte, humanize.MiByte*10 - 1},
	{"BETWEEN_10_MB_AND_64_MB", humanize.MiByte * 10, humanize.MiByte*64 - 1},
	{"BETWEEN_64_MB_AND_128_MB", humanize.MiByte * 64, humanize.MiByte*128 - 1},

    // Replace the two present elements.
    cache.put(23, 20);
    cache.put(56, 49);
    cache.put(23, 2);
    cache.put(56, 4);

    // Expire the two present elements.
    fakeTicker.advance(1001, MILLISECONDS);

    cache.getIfPresent(23);
    cache.getIfPresent(56);

    // Add two elements and invalidate them.
    cache.put(1, 4);
    cache.put(2, 8);

    cache.invalidateAll();

            return timestamp;
        }

        /**
         * Sets the notification timestamp.
         *
         * @param timestamp the timestamp value in FILETIME format (100-nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601 UTC)
         */
        public void setTimestamp(long timestamp) {
            this.timestamp = timestamp;
        }

        /**
         * Get the resource name associated with the notification

    RateLimiter unused;
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 1, NANOSECONDS);
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 0, NANOSECONDS);

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(0.0, 1, NANOSECONDS));

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(1.0, -1, NANOSECONDS));
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // difference in String.format rounding?

    RateLimiter unused;
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 1, NANOSECONDS);
    unused = RateLimiter.create(1.0, 0, NANOSECONDS);

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(0.0, 1, NANOSECONDS));

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> RateLimiter.create(1.0, -1, NANOSECONDS));
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // difference in String.format rounding?

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

    @Test
    void testShareInfoCtr502DecodeWithInvalidArraySize() throws NdrException {
        srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr502 ctr502 = new srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr502();

        when(mockNdrBuffer.dec_ndr_long()).thenReturn(10, 1); // count, array pointer
        when(mockDeferredBuffer.dec_ndr_long()).thenReturn(0x10000); // invalid array size

        assertThrows(NdrException.class, () -> ctr502.decode(mockNdrBuffer));
    }

    @Test

		}

		// release data to pool
		field.NewValuePool.Put(values[idx])
	}
}

// ScanMode scan data mode
type ScanMode uint8

// scan modes
const (
	ScanInitialized         ScanMode = 1 << 0 // 1
	ScanUpdate              ScanMode = 1 << 1 // 2
	ScanOnConflictDoNothing ScanMode = 1 << 2 // 4
)

// Scan scan rows into db statement
func Scan(rows Rows, db *DB, mode ScanMode) {
	var (

   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code maxLength} is less than the length of {@code
   *     truncationIndicator}
   * @since 16.0
   */
  public static String truncate(CharSequence seq, int maxLength, String truncationIndicator) {
    checkNotNull(seq);

    // length to truncate the sequence to, not including the truncation indicator

	if company.ID != 100 {
		t.Errorf("invalid primary key after creating, got %v", company.ID)
	}

	companies := []Company{
		{ID: 101, Name: "company101_with_primarykey"},
		{ID: 102, Name: "company102_with_primarykey"},
	}
	DB.Create(&companies)

	if companies[0].ID != 101 || companies[1].ID != 102 {
		t.Errorf("invalid primary key after creating, got %v, %v", companies[0].ID, companies[1].ID)
	}
}