the generated secret can then be passed to Helm using a values file or the `--set` parameter: ``` trustedCertsSecret: "minio-trusted-certs" or --set trustedCertsSecret=minio-trusted-certs ``` Create buckets after install ---------- Install the chart, specifying the buckets you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set buckets[0].name=bucket1,buckets[0].policy=none,buckets[0].purge=false minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `buckets[].name` - name...

the generated secret can then be passed to Helm using a values file or the `--set` parameter: ``` trustedCertsSecret: "minio-trusted-certs" or --set trustedCertsSecret=minio-trusted-certs ``` Create buckets after install ---------- Install the chart, specifying the buckets you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set buckets[0].name=bucket1,buckets[0].policy=none,buckets[0].purge=false minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `buckets[].name` - name...

the generated secret can then be passed to Helm using a values file or the `--set` parameter: ``` trustedCertsSecret: "minio-trusted-certs" or --set trustedCertsSecret=minio-trusted-certs ``` Create buckets after install ---------- Install the chart, specifying the buckets you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set buckets[0].name=bucket1,buckets[0].policy=none,buckets[0].purge=false minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `buckets[].name` - name...

        newCapacity = Integer.MAX_VALUE; // guaranteed to be >= newCapacity
      }
      return newCapacity;
    }

    /**
     * Returns a new immutable array. The builder can continue to be used after this call, to append
     * more values and build again.
     *
     * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the returned array is backed by the same array as the builder, so

  }

  int getSuccessor(int entryIndex) {
    return (entryIndex + 1 < size) ? entryIndex + 1 : -1;
  }

  /**
   * Updates the index an iterator is pointing to after a call to remove: returns the index of the
   * entry that should be looked at after a removal on indexRemoved, with indexBeforeRemove as the
   * index that *was* the next entry that would be looked at.
   */

                  + " output bits; The unaffected bits are "
                  + "as follows: "
                  + ~(same & diff)
                  + ". This was "
                  + "determined after "
                  + count
                  + " trials.");
        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Test for avalanche. Avalanche means that output bits differ with roughly 1/2 probability on

  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> of(
      E e1, E e2, E e3, E e4, E e5, E e6, E e7, E e8, E e9, E e10, E e11) {
    return construct(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6, e7, e8, e9, e10, e11);
  }

  // These go up to eleven. After that, you just get the varargs form, and
  // whatever warnings might come along with it. :(

  /**
   * Returns an immutable list containing the given elements, in order.
   *

  // and after successfully admitting desired pod resize.
  // +featureGate=InPlacePodVerticalScaling
  // +optional
  map<string, k8s.io.apimachinery.pkg.api.resource.Quantity> allocatedResources = 10;

  // Resources represents the compute resource requests and limits that have been successfully
  // enacted on the running container after it has been started or has been successfully resized.

      public OutputStream openStream() throws IOException {
        return encodingStream(encodedSink.openStream());
      }
    };
  }

  // TODO(lowasser): document the extent of leniency, probably after adding ignore(CharMatcher)

  private static byte[] extract(byte[] result, int length) {
    if (length == result.length) {
      return result;
    }
    byte[] trunc = new byte[length];

     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output
     * Future, then a call setException() would likely also overflow.
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed after set()/setValue() stored its result, then a call to
     * setException() will be a no-op because the Future is already done.
     *
     * Both scenarios are bad: The output Future might never complete, or, if it does complete, it