array[i] = counter.getAndIncrement();
        }
        builder.addAll(array);
      }
    },
    ;

    static final BuilderOp[] values = values();

    static BuilderOp randomOp() {
      return values[random.nextInt(values.length)];
    }

    abstract void doIt(ImmutableIntArray.Builder builder, AtomicInteger counter);
  }

  private static final Random random = new Random(42);

    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(multimap.asMap());
    Collection<Integer> valuesCopy = SerializableTester.reserialize(multimap.values());
    assertEquals(HashMultiset.create(multimap.values()), HashMultiset.create(valuesCopy));
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testEmptySerialization() {

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        assertNull(resultArray[0]);
        assertEquals("actualValue", resultArray[1]);
    }

    /**
     * Test array index calculation correctness
     * This verifies the fix for the original bug where values[values.length - 1 + i]
     * would cause ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
     */
    @Test
    public void test_arrayIndexCalculation() {
        TestFessTransformer transformer = new TestFessTransformer();

  private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Bytes.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Byte.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("encode_in should use default constructor values")
        void testEncodeInDefaultConstructor() throws Exception {
            // Given
            DcerpcBind defaultBind = new DcerpcBind();

            // When/Then - Should handle encoding with default values (nulls)
            assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {

    public void clear() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      delegate.clear();
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<V> values() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      /* TODO: verify that the Collection is also synchronized? */
      return delegate.values();
    }

    @Override
    public Set<Cell<R, C, V>> cellSet() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.cellSet();

foreach configuration element: