return []string{}, "", err
	}
	if podName != "" {
		return []string{podName}, namespace, err
	}

	options := metav1.ListOptions{LabelSelector: selector}
	podList, err := client.Pods(namespace).List(context.TODO(), options)
	if err != nil {
		return []string{}, "", err
	}
	pods := []string{}
	for i := range podList.Items {
		pods = append(pods, podList.Items[i].Name)
	}

	return pods, namespace, nil
}

    subclass_model = ModelWithCustomEncoderSubclass(dt_field=datetime(2019, 1, 1, 8))
    assert jsonable_encoder(subclass_model) == {"dt_field": "2019-01-01T08:00:00+00:00"}


# TODO: remove when deprecating Pydantic v1
@needs_pydanticv1
def test_encode_custom_json_encoders_model_pydanticv1():
    class ModelWithCustomEncoder(BaseModel):
        dt_field: datetime

        class Config:

## TODO

- Richer progress UI is not present at the moment, this will be addressed in subsequent releases. Currently however a RATE of data transfer and usage increase is displayed via `mc`.

        withLibraryDependencies<DependencyRemovalByNameRule>(
            "xyz.rogfam:littleproxy",
            setOf("barchart-udt-bundle", "guava", "commons-cli")
        )

        // TODO: Gradle profiler should use the bundled tooling API.
        //   This should actually be handled by conflict resolution, though it doesn't seem to work.
        //   See https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/12002.

	MD5, err := hex.DecodeString(md5Hex)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, BadDigest{ // TODO(aead): Return an error that indicates that an invalid ETag has been specified
			ExpectedMD5:   md5Hex,
			CalculatedMD5: "",
		}
	}
	SHA256, err := hex.DecodeString(sha256Hex)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, SHA256Mismatch{ // TODO(aead): Return an error that indicates that an invalid Content-SHA256 has been specified

  //
  // Future versions of the JMM may revise safe construction semantics in such a way that we can
  // safely publish these objects and we won't need this whole discussion.
  // TODO(user,lukes): consider adding volatile to all these fields since in current known JVMs
  // that should resolve the issue. This comes at the cost of adding more write barriers to the
  // implementations.

    // This lock protects the task so we can ensure that none of the template methods (startUp,
    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    class Task implements Runnable {

                    errMsg += " (You may need to remove the leading `javadoc` path component)";
                }
                errorsForFile.add(new Error(lineNumber, line, errMsg));
            }
            // TODO: Also parse the HTML in the javadoc file to check if the specific method is present
        }
    }

    private boolean fileContainsText(File referencedFile, String text) {
        try {

    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return getKey() + "=" + getValue();
    }
  }

  // TODO(fry): Separate logic for consistency between emul and nonemul implementation.
  // TODO(fry): Look into Maps.KeySet and Maps.Values, which can ideally be reused here but are
  // currently only package visible.
  abstract class AbstractCacheSet<T> extends AbstractSet<T> {

import org.apache.commons.cli.Option;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static java.util.Objects.nonNull;

/**
 * Pseudo test to generate documentation fragment about supported CLI options. TODO such documentation generation code
 * should not be necessary as unit test but should be run during site generation (Velocity? Doxia macro?)
 */
class CLIManagerDocumentationTest {