"",
        )
      },
    ).containsExactly(
      "callStart: Request{method=GET, url=http://google.com/robots.txt}",
      "proxySelectStart: http://google.com/",
      "proxySelectEnd: [DIRECT]",
      "dnsStart: google.com",
      "callFailed: java.net.UnknownHostException: shortcircuit",
    )
    // We should consider if these logs should retain Exceptions
    assertThat(logs.last().throwable).isNull()

Try to avoid using bitter sarcasm or potentially passive-aggressive comments. If something is wrong, it's better to be direct (try to be gentle) than sarcastic.

Try to be as specific and objective as possible, avoid generalizations.

For conversations that are more difficult, for example to reject a PR, you can ask me (@tiangolo) to handle it directly.

## Edit PR Titles

### Retorne uma Response diretamente { #return-a-response-directly }

O caso mais comum seria [retornar uma Response diretamente, conforme explicado posteriormente na documentação avançada](../advanced/response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_02_py39.py hl[8,10:11] *}

        SmbComClose smbComClose = new SmbComClose(config, fid, lastWriteTime);

        // Then
        assertEquals(ServerMessageBlock.SMB_COM_CLOSE, smbComClose.getCommand());
        // Private fields are not directly accessible, but we can check their effect in other methods.
    }

    /**
     * Test method for {@link jcifs.internal.smb1.com.SmbComClose#writeParameterWordsWireFormat(byte[], int)}.
     */
    @Test

   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

  private final String relationshipName;
  private final String hashName;

import java.util.Set;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tests for {@link Multimap#asMap}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Basher test for {@link ConcurrentHashMultiset}: start a bunch of threads, have each of them do
 * operations at random. Each thread keeps track of the per-key deltas that it's directly
 * responsible for; after all threads have completed, we sum the per-key deltas and compare to the
 * existing multiset values.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

@NullUnmarked

    protected MimeTypes mimeTypes;

    /** Whether to use the filename for MIME type detection. */
    protected boolean useFilename = false;

    /** Whether to use the filename for MIME type detection when the stream is detected as octet-stream. */
    protected boolean useFilenameOnOctetStream = true;

    /**
     * Creates a new MimeTypeHelperImpl instance.
     * Initializes the MimeTypes instance using the default configuration.

 * already covered by the corresponding Collection testers.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

### OAuth 1 { #oauth-1 }

Hubo un OAuth 1, que es muy diferente de OAuth2, y más complejo, ya que incluía especificaciones directas sobre cómo encriptar la comunicación.

No es muy popular o usado hoy en día.

OAuth2 no especifica cómo encriptar la comunicación, espera que tengas tu aplicación servida con HTTPS.

/// tip | Consejo