}
    assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter.onPattern(","));
  }

  /**
   * This test really pushes the boundaries of what we support. In general the splitter's behaviour
   * is not well defined if the char sequence it's splitting is mutated during iteration.
   */
  private void assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter splitter) {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();

* その後、翻訳に残っている問題を手動で修正し、良い翻訳にします。
* 良い翻訳を用意した状態でもう一度翻訳します。理想的な結果は、LLM が翻訳に一切変更を加えないことです。つまり general プロンプトと言語固有プロンプトが最良であることを意味します（時々いくつかランダムに見える変更を行うことがあります。理由は [LLM は決定論的アルゴリズムではない](https://doublespeak.chat/#/handbook#deterministic-output) ためです）。

テスト内容:

## コードスニペット { #code-snippets }

//// tab | テスト

これはコードスニペットです: `foo`。そしてこれもコードスニペットです: `bar`。さらにもう一つ: `baz quux`。

////

//// tab | 情報

labels.login.update=更新
labels.failure_url_link_create=作成
labels.crawling_info_link_delete=削除
labels.crawling_info_link_update=編集
labels.crawling_info_link_create=作成
labels.failure_url_link_update=編集

# Chat labels
labels.chat_title=AI検索モード - Fess
labels.chat_new_chat=新規チャット
labels.chat_input_placeholder=質問を入力してください...
labels.chat_thinking=回答中...
labels.chat_error=エラーが発生しました。もう一度お試しください。

	usersSysType UsersSysType

	rolesMap map[arn.ARN]string

	// Persistence layer for IAM subsystem
	store *IAMStoreSys

	// configLoaded will be closed and remain so after first load.
	configLoaded chan struct{}
}

// IAMUserType represents a user type inside MinIO server
type IAMUserType int

const (
	unknownIAMUserType IAMUserType = iota - 1
	regUser
	stsUser
	svcUser
)

// - a string representing the tracing implementation: "mlir" or "graphdef".
// - a boolean that when true enables TFRT as the execution engine.
class UnifiedCAPI
    : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::tuple<const char*, bool>> {
 protected:
  void SetUp() override {
    TF_StatusPtr status(TF_NewStatus());
    TF_SetTracingImplementation(std::get<0>(GetParam()), status.get());
    absl::Status s = StatusFromTF_Status(status.get());

        <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_new_line_before_finally_in_try_statement" value="do not insert"/>
        <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.tabulation.char" value="space"/>
        <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.wrap_before_string_concatenation" value="true"/>
        <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.lineSplit" value="140"/>

	}

	err = os.RemoveAll(path.Join(fsDirs[0], bucket, object, "xl.meta"))
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	// Write xl.meta with different modtime to simulate the case where a disk had
	// gone down when an object was replaced by a new object.
	fileInfoOutDated := fileInfoPreHeal
	fileInfoOutDated.ModTime = time.Now()
	err = disk.WriteMetadata(t.Context(), "", bucket, object, fileInfoOutDated)

	for i := range errs {
		errs[i] = errDiskOngoingReq
	}

	done := make(chan bool, er.setDriveCount)
	disks := er.getDisks()

	ropts := ReadOptions{
		ReadData:         readData,
		InclFreeVersions: opts.InclFreeVersions,
		Healing:          false,
	}

	mrfCheck := make(chan FileInfo)
	defer xioutil.SafeClose(mrfCheck)

	var rw sync.Mutex

	// Ask for all disks first;

 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break
 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *

		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.apache.groovy</groupId>
			<artifactId>groovy</artifactId>
			<version>${groovy.version}</version>
		</dependency>

		<!-- markdown and html sanitization for RAG chat -->
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.commonmark</groupId>
			<artifactId>commonmark</artifactId>
			<version>0.24.0</version>
		</dependency>
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.commonmark</groupId>