// or we could avoid inputstreamreader and use the decoder api directly
          // TODO(lukes): in a real implementation we would need to handle overflow conditions
          int maxChars = (int) (size.get().intValue() * cs.newDecoder().maxCharsPerByte());
          char[] buffer = new char[maxChars];
          int bufIndex = 0;
          int remaining = buffer.length;

   * time, then a request arrived and was immediately granted? This RateLimiter would immediately
   * forget about that past underutilization. This may result in either underutilization or
   * overflow, depending on the real world consequences of not using the expected rate.
   *
   * Past underutilization could mean that excess resources are available. Then, the RateLimiter

        // When
        int bytesWritten = trans2GetDfsReferral.writeParametersWireFormat(dst, 0);

        // Then
        assertTrue(bytesWritten > 0);
        // Verify that encoding doesn't overflow
        assertTrue(bytesWritten < dst.length);
    }

      // as a long, without risk of overflow:
      long numerator = (long) index * (dataset.length - 1);
      // Since scale is a positive int, index is in [0, scale], and (dataset.length - 1) is a
      // non-negative int, we can do long-arithmetic on index * (dataset.length - 1) / scale to get
      // a rounded ratio and a remainder which can be expressed as ints, without risk of overflow:

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

   * thrown by {@linkplain MoreExecutors#directExecutor direct execution}) will be caught and
   * logged.
   *
   * <p>Note: If your listener is lightweight -- and will not cause stack overflow by completing
   * more futures or adding more {@code directExecutor()} listeners inline -- consider {@link
   * MoreExecutors#directExecutor}. Otherwise, avoid it: See the warnings on the docs for {@code
   * directExecutor}.

func exponentialBackoffWait(r *rand.Rand, unit, maxSleep time.Duration) func(uint) time.Duration {
	if unit > time.Hour {
		// Protect against integer overflow
		panic("unit cannot exceed one hour")
	}
	return func(attempt uint) time.Duration {
		if attempt > 16 {
			// Protect against integer overflow
			attempt = 16
		}
		// sleep = random_between(unit, min(cap, base * 2 ** attempt))

        assertArrayEquals(testData, copiedData);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should check if error response for buffer overflow status")
    void testIsErrorResponseStatusBufferOverflow() throws Exception {
        // Given - Use reflection to set status
        Field statusField = ServerMessageBlock2.class.getDeclaredField("status");