if (delegate == null) {
        return;
      }

      /*
       * If we're about to complete the TimeoutFuture, we want to release our reference to it.
       * Otherwise, we'll pin it (and its result) in memory until the timeout task is GCed. (The
       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *

			lifecycleResponse:  []byte(""),
			errorResponse: APIErrorResponse{
				Resource: SlashSeparator + bucketName + SlashSeparator,
				Code:     "InvalidAccessKeyId",
				Message:  "The Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records.",
			},
			shouldPass: false,
		},
		// PUT empty credentials
		{
			method:             http.MethodPut,
			bucketName:         bucketName,
			accessKey:          "",
			secretKey:          "",

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")
  @ParametricNullness

  }

  public Test testsForLinkedList() {
    return QueueTestSuiteBuilder.using(
            new TestStringQueueGenerator() {
              @Override
              // We are testing LinkedList / testing our tests on LinkedList.
              @SuppressWarnings("JdkObsolete")
              public Queue<String> create(String[] elements) {
                return new LinkedList<>(MinimalCollection.of(elements));
              }

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

    // We want the JDK Pattern compiler:
    // - under Android (where it hurts startup performance)
    // - even for the JVM in our open-source release (https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3147)
    // If anyone in our monorepo uses the Android copy of Guava on a JVM, that would be unfortunate.
    // But that is only likely to happen in Robolectric tests, where the risks of JDK regex are low.

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect.testing;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * A type which will never be used as the element type of any collection in our tests, and so can be
 * used to test how a Collection behaves when given input of the wrong type.
 */
@GwtCompatible
public enum WrongType {
  VALUE

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */

    available in those versions!


## Version 4.8.0

_2020-07-11_

 *  New: Change `HeldCertificate.Builder` to use its own ASN.1 certificate encoder. This is part
    of our effort to remove the okhttp-tls module's dependency on Bouncy Castle. We think Bouncy
    Castle is great! But it's a large dependency (6.5 MiB) and its security provider feature
    impacts VM-wide behavior.

   *
   * - It might be preferable to be consistent with the JDK precedent (which they stuck with even
   *   for "UncheckedIOException").
   *
   * - If we change the name, some of our callers break because our Android Lint ParameterName check
   *   doesn't make the exception for com.google.common that internal Error Prone does: b/386402967.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("IdentifierName")