Porém para as respostas adicionais, você deve garantir que está retornando um `Response` como por exemplo o `JSONResponse` diretamente, junto com o código de status e o conteúdo.

## Retorno Adicional com `model`

Você pode fornecer o parâmetro `responses` aos seus *decoradores de caminho*.

  /**
   * Remove {@code edge} from the set of incoming edges. Returns the former predecessor node.
   *
   * <p>In the undirected case, returns {@code null} if {@code isSelfLoop} is true.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Nullable N removeInEdge(E edge, boolean isSelfLoop);

  /** Remove {@code edge} from the set of outgoing edges. Returns the former successor node. */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  N removeOutEdge(E edge);

  /**

 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to
 *       the callable itself nor to any {@code Future} returned by an {@code AsyncCallable}.
 *       (However, cancellation can prevent an <i>unstarted</i> task from running.) Therefore, the
 *       next task will wait for any running callable (or pending {@code Future} returned by an

WIP ML Build Docker container for ML repositories (Tensorflow, JAX and XLA).

This container branches off from
/tensorflow/tools/tf_sig_build_dockerfiles/. However, since
hermetic CUDA and hermetic Python is now available for Tensorflow, a lot of the
requirements installed on the original container can be removed to reduce the
footprint of the container and make it more reusable across different ML

SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE

INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

        // For 100% coverage, we'd need to ensure the superclass constructor is indeed called with these values.
        // However, given the current structure, testing the fields set by MsrpcEnumerateAliasesInDomain itself is the primary focus.
    }