public String getPropertyValue() {
            return propertyValue;
        }

        /**
         * Checks if the passed in line should be combined with the following.
         * This is true, if the line ends with an odd number of backslashes.
         *
         * @param line the line
         * @return a flag if the lines should be combined
         */
        private static boolean checkCombineLines(String line) {

        public String getPropertyValue() {
            return propertyValue;
        }

        /**
         * Checks if the passed in line should be combined with the following.
         * This is true, if the line ends with an odd number of backslashes.
         *
         * @param line the line
         * @return a flag if the lines should be combined
         */
        private static boolean checkCombineLines(String line) {

func pathClean(p string) string {
	cp := path.Clean(p)
	if cp == "." {
		return ""
	}
	return cp
}

func trimLeadingSlash(ep string) string {
	if len(ep) > 0 && ep[0] == '/' {
		// Path ends with '/' preserve it
		if ep[len(ep)-1] == '/' && len(ep) > 1 {
			ep = path.Clean(ep)
			ep += slashSeparator
		} else {
			ep = path.Clean(ep)
		}
		ep = ep[1:]
	}
	return ep
}

    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually
    // waited and assert based on that time. Empirically, the race where the thread ends up waiting
    // for 5.5 seconds happens about 2% of the time.
    boolean longWait = NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(thread.timeSpentBlocked) >= 5;

    testRotate(new long[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new long[] {1});
    testRotate(new long[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new long[] {1});
    testRotate(new long[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new long[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new long[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new long[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new long[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new long[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

    testRotate(new short[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new short[] {1});
    testRotate(new short[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new short[] {1});
    testRotate(new short[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new short[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new short[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new short[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new short[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new short[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

		// considered as Delete marker true to avoid listing such objects by
		// regular ListObjects() calls. However for delete replication this
		// ends up being a problem because "upon" a successful delete this
		// ends up creating a new delete marker that is spurious and unnecessary.
		//
		// Regression introduced by #14555 was reintroduced in #15564
		if versionFound {

    testRotate(new double[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new double[] {1});
    testRotate(new double[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new double[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new double[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new double[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new double[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new double[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

    final long[] array;
    final int start;
    final int end;

    LongArrayAsList(long[] array) {
      this(array, 0, array.length);
    }

    LongArrayAsList(long[] array, int start, int end) {
      this.array = array;
      this.start = start;
      this.end = end;
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
      return end - start;
    }

    @Override

    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new float[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});