# Behind a Proxy { #behind-a-proxy }

In many situations, you would use a **proxy** like Traefik or Nginx in front of your FastAPI app.

These proxies could handle HTTPS certificates and other things.

## Proxy Forwarded Headers { #proxy-forwarded-headers }

    // This lock protects the task so we can ensure that none of the template methods (startUp,
    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {

 *       returns {@code true}.
 *   <li>A class which implements {@code Comparable<UnrelatedType>} is very broken, and will cause
 *       undefined horrible things to happen in {@code Range}. For now, the Range API does not
 *       prevent its use, because this would also rule out all ungenerified (pre-JDK1.5) data types.
 *       <b>This may change in the future.</b>
 * </ul>
 *

  /**
   * Marks the given node as 'deleted' (null waiter) and then scans the list to unlink all deleted
   * nodes. This is an O(n) operation in the common case (and O(n^2) in the worst), but we are saved
   * by two things.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>This is only called when a waiting thread times out or is interrupted. Both of which
   *       should be rare.
   *   <li>The waiters list should be very short.
   * </ul>
   */

        }
      }
      return map.values();
    }

    private ImmutableList<Method> getVisibleMethods(Class<?> cls) {
      // Don't use cls.getPackage() because it does nasty things like reading
      // a file.
      String visiblePackage = Reflection.getPackageName(cls);
      ImmutableList.Builder<Method> builder = ImmutableList.builder();

         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The
         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We

Він був створений для створення HTML у серверній частині, а не для створення API, які використовуються сучасним інтерфейсом (як-от React, Vue.js і Angular) або іншими системами (як-от <abbr title="Internet of Things">IoT</abbr > пристрої), які спілкуються з ним.

### <a href="https://www.django-rest-framework.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Django REST Framework</a>

    // This lock protects the task so we can ensure that none of the template methods (startUp,
    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {

   *   flooding. Callers can confirm this by null-checking delegateOrNull().
   *
   * In an ideal world, we would document why we know those things are true every time we call these
   * methods. But that is a bit too painful....
   */

  private Object requireTable() {
    return requireNonNull(table);
  }

  private int[] requireEntries() {

Es wurde erstellt, um den HTML-Code im Backend zu generieren, nicht um APIs zu erstellen, die von einem modernen Frontend (wie React, Vue.js und Angular) oder von anderen Systemen (wie <abbr title="Internet of Things – Internet der Dinge">IoT</abbr>-Geräten) verwendet werden, um mit ihm zu kommunizieren.

### <a href="https://www.django-rest-framework.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Django REST Framework</a> { #django-rest-framework }