},
              "waiting": {
                "delay": 2628000,
                "message": "As this PR has been waiting for the original user for a while but seems to be inactive, it's now going to be closed. But if there's anyone interested, feel free to create a new PR."
              },

    )
    assertThat(webSocket.close(1000, null)).isFalse()
  }

  /**
   * There's no read timeout when reading the first byte of a new frame. But as soon as we start
   * reading a frame we enable the read timeout. In this test we have the server returning the first
   * byte of a frame but no more frames.
   */
  @Test
  fun readTimeoutAppliesWithinFrames() {
    webServer.dispatcher =
      object : Dispatcher() {

  // could find them in the code review archives), but here are a few:
  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();

        - label: I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to [Pydantic](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic).
          required: true
        - label: I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to [Swagger UI](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui).
          required: true
        - label: I already checked if it is not related to FastAPI but to [ReDoc](https://github.com/Redocly/redoc).
          required: true

		if rec.Code != testCase.expectedRespStatus {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected the response status to be `%d`, but instead found `%d`", i+1, instanceType, testCase.expectedRespStatus, rec.Code)
		}
		if testCase.shouldPass && !bytes.Equal(testCase.lifecycleResponse, rec.Body.Bytes()) {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected the response to be `%s`, but instead found `%s`", i+1, instanceType, string(testCase.lifecycleResponse), rec.Body.String())
		}

///

## OpenAPI and API docs { #openapi-and-api-docs }

If you return additional status codes and responses directly, they won't be included in the OpenAPI schema (the API docs), because FastAPI doesn't have a way to know beforehand what you are going to return.

import java.util.function.Supplier;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tester for {@code Spliterator} implementations.
 *
 * @since 33.4.0 (but since 21.0 in the JRE flavor)
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
@IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using Spliterator.
public final class SpliteratorTester<E extends @Nullable Object> {

 * Futures#transform(ListenableFuture, com.google.common.base.Function, Executor) Futures.transform}
 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)
 * FluentFuture.transform}), but you will often find it easier to use a framework. Frameworks
 * automate the process, often adding features like monitoring, debugging, and cancellation.
 * Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>