* {@code throws} clause: Some such methods can in fact throw a checked exception (e.g., by
   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@link #addListener addListener} is to support this chaining. You will
 * rarely use it directly, in part because it does not provide direct access to the {@code Future}
 * result. (If you want such access, you may prefer {@link Futures#addCallback
 * Futures.addCallback}.) Still, direct {@code addListener} calls are occasionally useful:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final String name = ...;
 * inFlight.add(name);

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@link #addListener addListener} is to support this chaining. You will
 * rarely use it directly, in part because it does not provide direct access to the {@code Future}
 * result. (If you want such access, you may prefer {@link Futures#addCallback
 * Futures.addCallback}.) Still, direct {@code addListener} calls are occasionally useful:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final String name = ...;
 * inFlight.add(name);

				t.Fatalf("unable to write previously parsed content: %s", err)
			}
		}
		if err := w.Close(); err != nil {
			t.Fatalf("Unable to write archive: %s", err)
		}

		// TODO: We may want to check if the archive roundtrips. This would require
		// taking into account addition of the two zero trailer blocks that Writer.Close
		// appends.
	})

            super.process(consumer);
            latch.countDown();
        }

        @Override
        public void waitForProcessed() throws InterruptedException {
            latch.await();
        }
    }

      }
    }.start();

    try {
      computingSignal.await();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException(e);
    }

    map.put(one, two);
    assertThat(map.get(one)).isSameInstanceAs(two);
    startSignal.countDown();

    try {
      doneSignal.await();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException(e);
    }

      }
    }.start();

    try {
      computingSignal.await();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException(e);
    }

    map.put(one, two);
    assertThat(map.get(one)).isSameInstanceAs(two);
    startSignal.countDown();

    try {
      doneSignal.await();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException(e);
    }

{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/tutorial001_py39.py hl[2,12,15:18] *}

/// tip

Notice that the testing functions are normal `def`, not `async def`.

And the calls to the client are also normal calls, not using `await`.

This allows you to use `pytest` directly without complications.

///

/// note | Technical Details

You could also use `from starlette.testclient import TestClient`.

                } catch (Exception e) {
                    exception.set(e);
                } finally {
                    latch.countDown();
                }
            });
        }

        latch.await(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        executor.shutdown();

        if (exception.get() != null) {
            throw exception.get();
        }
    }

{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/tutorial001.py hl[2,12,15:18] *}


/// tip | Порада

Зверніть увагу, що тестові функції — це звичайні `def`, а не `async def`.

Виклики клієнта також звичайні, без використання `await`.

Це дозволяє використовувати `pytest` без зайвих ускладнень.

///

/// note | Технічні деталі

Ви також можете використовувати `from starlette.testclient import TestClient`.