class="org.codelibs.fess.crawler.extractor.impl.HtmlExtractor">
		<property name="featureMap">
			<component class="java.util.LinkedHashMap">
				<postConstruct name="put">
					<arg>"http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces"</arg>
					<arg>"false"</arg>
				</postConstruct>
			</component>
		</property>
		<property name="propertyMap">
			<component class="java.util.LinkedHashMap">
			</component>
		</property>

 *   <li>readTimeout - Read timeout in milliseconds (default: 10000)</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The client supports URLs in the format: {@code storage://bucket-name/object-path}
 *
 * <p>Features:
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Automatic initialization of MinIO client</li>
 *   <li>Support for HEAD and GET operations</li>
 *   <li>Content length validation</li>
 *   <li>MIME type detection</li>

 * <Long>}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Improved memory compactness and locality.
 *   <li>Can be queried without allocating garbage.
 *   <li>Access to {@code LongStream} features (like {@link LongStream#sum}) using {@code stream()}
 *       instead of the awkward {@code stream().mapToLong(v -> v)}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code ImmutableList<Long>}:
 *
 * <ul>

 * <Integer>}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Improved memory compactness and locality.
 *   <li>Can be queried without allocating garbage.
 *   <li>Access to {@code IntStream} features (like {@link IntStream#sum}) using {@code stream()}
 *       instead of the awkward {@code stream().mapToInt(v -> v)}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code ImmutableList<Integer>}:
 *
 * <ul>

 *       doesn't offer a way to wait for multiple producers to all report that they're "ready," nor
 *       does it offer a way to batch multiple events from a single producer together.
 *   <li>It doesn't support backpressure and other features needed for resilience.
 *   <li>It doesn't provide much control of threading.
 *   <li>It doesn't offer much monitoring.
 *   <li>It doesn't propagate exceptions, so apps don't have a way to react to them.

In almost any framework handling the security becomes a rather complex subject quite quickly.

Many packages that simplify it a lot have to make many compromises with the data model, database, and available features. And some of these packages that simplify things too much actually have security flaws underneath.

---

**FastAPI** doesn't make any compromise with any database, data model or tool.

        "@platforms//cpu:x86_64",
    ],
    visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)

# Features that are default ON are handled differently below.
#
config_setting(
    name = "no_gcp_support",
    define_values = {"no_gcp_support": "true"},
    visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)

# Experimental features
config_setting(
    name = "stackdriver_support",
    define_values = {"stackdriver_support": "true"},

}

// BackendDown is returned for network errors
type BackendDown struct {
	Err string
}

func (e BackendDown) Error() string {
	return e.Err
}

// NotImplemented If a feature is not implemented
type NotImplemented struct {
	Message string
}

func (e NotImplemented) Error() string {
	return e.Message
}

// UnsupportedMetadata - unsupported metadata

 * types of crawlers (web, file, data). It manages the crawler process lifecycle,
 * handles timeout scenarios, and ensures proper cleanup of resources.</p>
 *
 * <p>Key features:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Concurrent crawler process management with configurable limits</li>
 *   <li>Selective crawling based on configuration IDs</li>
 *   <li>Document expiration handling</li>

            IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> networkAsMutableNetwork.addEdge(N1, N1, E11));
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains(ERROR_SELF_LOOP);
  }

  /**
   * This test checks an implementation dependent feature. It tests that the method {@code addEdge}
   * will silently add the missing nodes to the graph, then add the edge connecting them. We are not