}

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getAddress/getFirstAddress resolution branches and iteration")
    void testAddressResolutionAndIteration() throws Exception {
        // Query parameter 'server' takes precedence
        UniAddress a1 = mock(UniAddress.class);
        when(nsc.getByName("srv-from-query")).thenReturn(a1);
        SmbResourceLocatorImpl l1 = locator("smb://host/share?server=srv-from-query");

            ContiguousSet.closedOpen(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MIN_VALUE),
            ImmutableSortedSet.of(),
            ImmutableSet.of())
        .testEquals();
    // not testing hashCode for these because it takes forever to compute
    assertEquals(
        ContiguousSet.closed(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE),
        ContiguousSet.create(Range.<Integer>all(), integers()));
    assertEquals(

   * canceled. For example, happy-path events like [requestHeadersStart] and [requestHeadersEnd] may
   * occur after a call is canceled. Typically cancellation takes effect when an expensive I/O
   * operation is required.
   *
   * This is invoked at most once, even if [Call.cancel] is invoked multiple times. It may be

        byte[] src = new byte[20];
        // No pointer, so mockRecordName will be read
        NameServicePacket.writeInt2(NameServicePacket.A, src, 10); // recordType (assuming name takes 10 bytes)
        NameServicePacket.writeInt2(NameServicePacket.IN, src, 12); // recordClass
        NameServicePacket.writeInt4(100, src, 14); // ttl
        NameServicePacket.writeInt2(6, src, 18); // rDataLength

        .isEqualTo(0xFFEEDDCC);
  }

  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Ints.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      int num = r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Ints.fromByteArray(Ints.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);

    ImmutableMap<Service, Long> startupTimes = serviceManager.startupTimes();
    assertThat(startupTimes).hasSize(2);
    assertThat(startupTimes.get(a)).isAtLeast(150);
    // Service b startup takes at least 353 millis, but starting the timer is delayed by at least
    // 150 milliseconds. so in a perfect world the timing would be 353-150=203ms, but since either

            sameSite = attributeValue
          }
        }

        pos = attributePairEnd + 1
      }

      // If 'Max-Age' is present, it takes precedence over 'Expires', regardless of the order the two
      // attributes are declared in the cookie string.
      if (deltaSeconds == Long.MIN_VALUE) {
        expiresAt = Long.MIN_VALUE

          exception.addSuppressed(new FailedService(service));
        }
        throw exception;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * A {@link Service} that wraps another service and times how long it takes for it to start and
   * also calls the {@link ServiceManagerState#transitionService(Service, State, State)}, to record
   * the state transitions.
   */
  private static final class ServiceListener extends Service.Listener {

          exception.addSuppressed(new FailedService(service));
        }
        throw exception;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * A {@link Service} that wraps another service and times how long it takes for it to start and
   * also calls the {@link ServiceManagerState#transitionService(Service, State, State)}, to record
   * the state transitions.
   */
  private static final class ServiceListener extends Service.Listener {

 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
 *   <li>for nested locking, the cost increases with the depth of the nesting:
 *       <ul>
 *         <li>2 levels: average of 64ns per lock()/unlock()