* the <code>Mojo</code> to communicate errors.
     *
     * @throws MojoExecutionException if an unexpected problem occurs.
     * Throwing this exception causes a "BUILD ERROR" message to be displayed.
     * @throws MojoFailureException if an expected problem (such as a compilation failure) occurs.
     * Throwing this exception causes a "BUILD FAILURE" message to be displayed.
     */

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

  return when {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    e is ProtocolException -> false

    // If there was an interruption or timeout (SocketTimeoutException), don't recover.
    // For the socket connect timeout case we do not try the same host with a different
    // ConnectionSpec: we assume it is unreachable.
    e is InterruptedIOException -> false

                .findFirst()
                .get();
        assertEquals("0.3", dep.getVersion());
        assertEquals(1, result.getProblems().size());
        ModelProblem problem = result.getProblems().get(0);
        assertTrue(problem.toString().contains("Ignored POM import"));
    }

    /**
     * This test has
     *   - a BOM import which itself imports the junit BOM which manages the dep to 0.1

 * and its subclass in different packages, causing the serialization system to fail to invoke {@code
 * writeReplace} when serializing an instance of the subclass. For an example of this problem, see
 * b/310253115.
 */
public class WriteReplaceOverridesTest extends TestCase {
  private static final ImmutableSet<String> GUAVA_PACKAGES =
      FluentIterable.of(
              "base",
              "cache",

                    server = result.getServer();

                    if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                        for (SettingsProblem problem : result.getProblems()) {
                            logger.debug(problem.getMessage(), problem.getException());
                        }
                    }

      e is FileNotFoundException
  }

  private fun isRecoverable(
    e: IOException,
    requestSendStarted: Boolean,
  ): Boolean {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    if (e is ProtocolException) {
      return false
    }

    // If there was an interruption don't recover, but if there was a timeout connecting to a route

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.