}

  /**
   * This test attempts to cause a future to wait for longer than it was requested to from a timed
   * get() call. As measurements of time are prone to flakiness, it tries to assert based on ranges
   * derived from observing how much time actually passed for various operations.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck")
  @AndroidIncompatible // Thread.suspend

        return true;
      }
    }
    throw new AssertionError();
  }

  /*
   * If n <= millerRabinBases[i][0], then testing n against bases millerRabinBases[i][1..] suffices
   * to prove its primality. Values from miller-rabin.appspot.com.
   *
   * NOTE: We could get slightly better bases that would be treated as unsigned, but benchmarks
   * showed negligible performance improvements.
   */

have both been migrated.

### gRPC Probes Graduate to Beta

With Kubernetes 1.24, the [gRPC probes functionality](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2727)
has entered beta and is available by default. You can now [configure startup, liveness, and readiness probes](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/#configure-probes) for your gRPC app

    public int hashCode() {
      // Warning: this is broken if size() == 0, so it is critical that we
      // substitute an empty ImmutableSet to the user in place of this

      // It's a weird formula, but tests prove it works.
      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }

/**
 * A synchronization abstraction supporting waiting on arbitrary boolean conditions.
 *
 * <p>This class is intended as a replacement for {@link ReentrantLock}. Code using {@code Monitor}
 * is less error-prone and more readable than code using {@code ReentrantLock}, without significant
 * performance loss. {@code Monitor} even has the potential for performance gain by optimizing the

    }
  }

  /*
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull is *intended* for performing eager null checks on parameters that a
   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past

	}

	// The Reader should have buffered all the content from the io.Reader.
	if n := len(eofR.buf); n != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("got %d bytes left in bufio.Reader source; want 0 bytes", n)
	}
	// To prove the point, check that there are still 5 bytes available to read.
	if n := r.Buffered(); n != 5 {
		t.Fatalf("got %d bytes buffered in bufio.Reader; want 5 bytes", n)
	}

	// This is the second read of 0 bytes.

## Changelog since v1.18.18

## Changes by Kind

### API Change

- We have added a new Priority & Fairness rule that exempts all probes (/readyz, /healthz, /livez) to prevent 
  restarting of "healthy" kube-apiserver instance(s) by kubelet. ([#101114](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/101114), [@tkashem](https://github.com/tkashem)) [SIG API Machinery]

                this.fileLocator.updateType(response.getFileType());
                info = response;
                fileSize = response.getDataSize();

                // this is so damn unreliable, needs another race-prone query if required
                haveAttributes = false;

                // This seems to be the only way to obtain a reliable (with respect to locking) file size here

*  particular purpose or non-infringing. The entire risk as to the     *
*  quality and performance of the Covered Software is with You.        *
*  Should any Covered Software prove defective in any respect, You     *
*  (not any Contributor) assume the cost of any necessary servicing,   *
*  repair, or correction. This disclaimer of warranty constitutes an   *