* granted only 100ms ago, then we wait for another 100ms. At this rate, serving 15 fresh permits
   * (i.e. for an acquire(15) request) naturally takes 3 seconds.
   *
   * It is important to realize that such a RateLimiter has a very superficial memory of the past:
   * it only remembers the last request. What if the RateLimiter was unused for a long period of

        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling
        features down to compact but powerful abstractions, and controlling feature bloat carefully.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:

We use *Specification* and *Discovery* documents stored in Google Drive, but they present some downsides:

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be

    * Isso será usado pela **documentação automática**.
    * Também será usado por ferramentas de geração automática de código do cliente.

Mas o mais importante:

* Ele **limitará e filtrará** os dados de saída para o que está definido no tipo de retorno.
    * Isso é particularmente importante para a **segurança**, veremos mais sobre isso abaixo.

## Parâmetro `response_model` { #response-model-parameter }

			t.Fatalf("errors happened on update: %v", results.Error)
		} else if results.RowsAffected != 1 {
			t.Fatalf("rows affected expects: %v, got %v", 1, results.RowsAffected)
		}

		u1 = user{} // important to reinitialize this before creating it again
		u2 := user{}
		db := DB.Session(&gorm.Session{CreateBatchSize: 10})

		if results := db.Create([]*user{&u1, &u2}); results.Error != nil {

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link
 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>

    assertThat(surrogateEscaper.escape(safeInput)).isEqualTo(safeInput);

    // A surrogate pair defining a code point outside the safe range (but both
    // of the surrogate characters lie within the safe range). It is important
    // not to accidentally treat this as a sequence of safe characters.
    String unsafeInput = "\uDBFF\uDFFF"; // 0x10FFFF
    assertThat(surrogateEscaper.escape(unsafeInput)).isEqualTo("X");
  }

Se você estiver ajudando muitas pessoas com suas perguntas, você se tornará um(a) [Especialista em FastAPI](fastapi-people.md#fastapi-experts){.internal-link target=_blank} oficial. 🎉

Apenas lembre-se, o ponto mais importante é: tente ser gentil. As pessoas chegam com frustrações e, em muitos casos, não perguntam da melhor forma, mas tente ao máximo ser gentil. 🤗

 │                      │
 ╰──────────────────────╯

<font color="#3465A4">INFO    </font> Importing module <font color="#4E9A06">main</font>
<font color="#3465A4">INFO    </font> Found importable FastAPI app

 ╭─ <font color="#8AE234"><b>Importable FastAPI app</b></font> ─╮
 │                          │

    * Si on compare FastAPI, il faut le comparer à d'autres frameworks web (ou ensemble d'outils) qui fournissent la validation des données, la sérialisation et la documentation, comme Flask-apispec, NestJS, Molten, etc....