* <p>This is designed for generating persistent fingerprints of strings. It isn't
   * cryptographically secure, but it produces a high-quality hash with few collisions. Fingerprints
   * generated using this are byte-wise identical to those created using the C++ version, but note
   * that this uses unsigned integers (see {@link com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedInts}).
   * Comparisons between the two should take this into account.
   *

        .isEqualTo("");
    assertThat(new ClassInfo(FILE, "a/b/Foo.class", getClass().getClassLoader()).getPackageName())
        .isEqualTo("a.b");
  }

  // Test that ResourceInfo.urls() returns identical content to ClassLoader.getResources()


  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testGetClassPathUrls() throws Exception {
    if (isWindows()) {

  // Bulk Operations

  /**
   * Adds a number of occurrences of an element to this multiset. Note that if {@code occurrences ==
   * 1}, this method has the identical effect to {@link #add(Object)}. This method is functionally
   * equivalent (except in the case of overflow) to the call {@code
   * addAll(Collections.nCopies(element, occurrences))}, which would presumably perform much more

     *       cleared, we know that we're not executing inline any more
     * </ul>
     *
     * All the states where thread != currentThread are identical for our purposes, and so even
     * though it's racy, we don't care which of those values we get, so no need to synchronize.
     */
    @LazyInit @Nullable Thread thread;

	ResetStatusesMap           map[string]string                 // map of ARN-> stringified reset id and timestamp for all the targets
}

// Equal returns true if replication state is identical for version purge statuses and (replica)tion statuses.
func (rs *ReplicationState) Equal(o ReplicationState) bool {
	return rs.ReplicaStatus == o.ReplicaStatus &&
		rs.ReplicationStatusInternal == o.ReplicationStatusInternal &&

    } catch (UnknownHostException e) {
      throw new AssertionError(e);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns the string representation of an {@link InetAddress}.
   *
   * <p>For IPv4 addresses, this is identical to {@link InetAddress#getHostAddress()}, but for IPv6
   * addresses, the output follows <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952">RFC 5952</a> section

    assertEquals(1, matcher.countIn(s));
  }

  /**
   * Checks that expected is equals to out, and further, if in is equals to expected, then out is
   * successfully optimized to be identical to in, i.e. that "in" is simply returned.
   */
  private void assertEqualsSame(String expected, String in, String out) {
    if (expected.equals(in)) {
      assertThat(out).isSameInstanceAs(in);
    } else {

  // Bulk Operations

  /**
   * Adds a number of occurrences of an element to this multiset. Note that if {@code occurrences ==
   * 1}, this method has the identical effect to {@link #add(Object)}. This method is functionally
   * equivalent (except in the case of overflow) to the call {@code
   * addAll(Collections.nCopies(element, occurrences))}, which would presumably perform much more

   * set of the empty set is not the empty set, but a one-element set containing the empty set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set and its constituent sets use {@code equals} to decide whether two elements
   * are identical, even if the input set uses a different concept of equivalence.
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the power set of a set with size {@code n} is of size {@code

This style of using `async` and `await` is relatively new in the language.

But it makes working with asynchronous code a lot easier.

This same syntax (or almost identical) was also included recently in modern versions of JavaScript (in Browser and NodeJS).

But before that, handling asynchronous code was quite more complex and difficult.