// we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(NoRecurse.SUBMAP)) {
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  @Override

      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
    }

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using

  // The number of compression rounds.
  private final int c;
  // The number of finalization rounds.
  private final int d;
  // Two 64-bit keys (represent a single 128-bit key).
  private final long k0;
  private final long k1;

  /**
   * @param c the number of compression rounds (must be positive)
   * @param d the number of finalization rounds (must be positive)
   * @param k0 the first half of the key

- Volume binding: report UnschedulableAndUnresolvable status instead of an error when bound PVs not found ([#95541](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/95541), [@cofyc](https://github.com/cofyc)) [SIG Apps, Scheduling and Storage]

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(NoRecurse.SUBMAP)) {
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  @Override

 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

Shinsuke Sugaya <******@****.***> 1576358545 +0900

Shinsuke Sugaya <******@****.***> 1576358545 +0900