def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Opérations asynchrones pour créer les burgers
    return burgers
```

Avec `async def`, Python sait que dans cette fonction il doit prendre en compte les expressions `await`, et qu'il peut mettre en pause ⏸ l'exécution de la fonction pour aller faire autre chose 🔀 avant de revenir.

Pour appeler une fonction définie avec `async def`, vous devez utiliser `await`. Donc ceci ne marche pas :

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Do some sequential stuff to create the burgers
    return burgers
```

With `async def`, Python knows that, inside that function, it has to be aware of `await` expressions, and that it can "pause" ⏸ the execution of that function and go do something else 🔀 before coming back.

When you want to call an `async def` function, you have to "await" it. So, this won't work:

```Python

		p.errorf("expected g or R0 through R15; found %s", name)
		return 0
	}
	return uint16(reg)
}

// Note: There are two changes in the expression handling here
// compared to the old yacc/C implementations. Neither has
// much practical consequence because the expressions we
// see in assembly code are simple, but for the record:
//
// 1) Evaluation uses uint64; the old one used int64.

- The "value" part in the `wait --for=jsonpath='{expression}'[=value]` is now
  optional. If the value is not provided i.e., the command looks like `wait --for=jsonpath='{expression}'`
  then the wait condition is interpreted as matched when the expression returns

                            prefix + path,
                            null,
                            "Failed to interpolate profile activation property " + s + ": " + propertyName
                                    + " expressions are not supported during profile activation.",
                            locationSupplier.get());
                }
            }
            return s;
        };

defined as the partial order requirements set out by the <a href="/ref/spec">Go language specification</a>
for Go's control flow constructs as well as the <a href="/ref/spec#Order_of_evaluation">order of evaluation for expressions</a>.
</p>

<p>
A Go <i>program execution</i> is modeled as a set of goroutine executions,
together with a mapping <i>W</i> that specifies the write-like operation that each read-like operation reads from.

 * instance, but has the chance to act on values <i>before</i> handing off to that backing instance.
 * As a result, it usually helps to read chained ordering expressions <i>backwards</i>. For example,
 * when {@code compare} is called on the above ordering:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>First, if only one {@code Foo} is null, that null value is treated as <i>greater</i>

- To enhance usability and developer experience, CRD validation rules now support direct use of (CEL) reserved keywords as field names in object validation expressions for existing expressions in storage, will fully support runtime in next release for compatibility concern. ([#126188](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126188), [@cici37](https://github.com/cici37)) [SIG API Machinery and Testing]

import (
	"database/sql"
	"database/sql/driver"
	"go/ast"
	"reflect"
)

// Expression expression interface
type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}

		}
	}

	// Remove functions only used as expressions, so their respective
	// bridge functions are not generated.
	for name, used := range functions {
		if !used {
			delete(f.Name, name)
		}
	}
}

// rewriteName returns the expression used to rewrite a reference.
// If addPosition is true, add position info in the ident name.