assertTrue(item1.equals(item2));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_equals_withNullOutput() {
        // Test equals with null output - should not throw, uses null-safe comparison
        String[] inputs1 = { "a", "b" };
        String[] inputs2 = { "a", "b" };
        String[] inputs3 = { "c", "d" };

        CharMappingItem item1 = new CharMappingItem(1L, inputs1, null);

        return this.address;
    }

    /**
     * Determines if this address is equal two another. Only the IP Addresses
     * are compared. Similar to the {@link #hashCode} method, the comparison
     * is based on the integer IP address and not the string representation.
     */

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {

 * offering expected O(n + k log k) performance (worst case O(n log k)) for n calls to {@link
 * #offer} and a call to {@link #topK}, with O(k) memory. In comparison, quickselect has the same
 * asymptotics but requires O(n) memory, and a {@code PriorityQueue} implementation takes O(n log
 * k). In benchmarks, this implementation performs at least as well as either implementation, and

      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }
    return -1;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the least value present in {@code array}, using the same rules of comparison as {@link
   * Math#min(double, double)}.
   *
   * @param array a <i>nonempty</i> array of {@code double} values
   * @return the value present in {@code array} that is less than or equal to every other value in

        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            queryFieldConfig.isSortField(testField);
        }
        long setDuration = System.nanoTime() - setStartTime;

        // For comparison, simulate array-based lookup
        long arrayStartTime = System.nanoTime();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            // Simulate original array-based lookup
            boolean found = false;

  // with the correct parameters.
  private static final int INITIAL_DELAY = 10;
  private static final int DELAY = 20;
  private static final TimeUnit UNIT = MILLISECONDS;

  // Unique runnable object used for comparison.
  @SuppressWarnings("AnonymousToLambda")
  final Runnable testRunnable =
      new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {}
      };

  boolean called = false;

  // with the correct parameters.
  private static final int INITIAL_DELAY = 10;
  private static final int DELAY = 20;
  private static final TimeUnit UNIT = MILLISECONDS;

  // Unique runnable object used for comparison.
  @SuppressWarnings("AnonymousToLambda")
  final Runnable testRunnable =
      new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {}
      };

  boolean called = false;

            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_EXECUTE < ACE.GENERIC_WRITE, "GENERIC_EXECUTE should be less than GENERIC_WRITE");
            // Note: GENERIC_READ (0x80000000) is negative, so it's less than positive values in signed comparison
            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_WRITE > 0 && ACE.GENERIC_READ < 0, "GENERIC_WRITE is positive, GENERIC_READ is negative");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should validate constant bit ranges")

 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> by default, the returned cache uses equality comparisons (the {@link
 * Object#equals equals} method) to determine equality for keys or values. However, if {@link
 * #weakKeys} was specified, the cache uses identity ({@code ==}) comparisons instead for keys.
 * Likewise, if {@link #weakValues} or {@link #softValues} was specified, the cache uses identity
 * comparisons for values.
 *

 *
 * // In case bug 12345 happens again we'd rather just die
 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems