return new ImmutableSortedMap<K, V>(delegate, comparator);
  }

  /*
   * We don't permit nulls, but we wrap every comparator with nullsFirst().
   * Why? We want for queries like containsKey(null) to return false, but the
   * GWT SortedMap implementation that we delegate to throws
   * NullPointerException if the comparator does. Since our construction

  <properties>
    <!--
    We could override this to change which version we run tests under.
    However, I think that our -Djava.security.manager=allow profile is based on the *Maven* JDK.
    If we want to use overrides here, we should change that profile to also be based on surefire.toolchain.version.
    -->
    <surefire.toolchain.version>${java.specification.version}</surefire.toolchain.version>

     * resolution, this does not include the download of the files for the dependency artifacts. It is meant for mojos
     * that only want to analyze the set of transitive dependencies, in particular during early lifecycle phases where
     * full dependency resolution might fail due to projects which haven't been built yet.
     *

         */
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        E targetReturnValueFromNext = (E) targetReturnValue;
        /*
         * We have an Iterator<E> and want to cast it to MultiExceptionListIterator. Because we're
         * inside an AbstractIteratorTester<E>, that's implicitly a cast to
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime won't be able to verify

   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would

      assertTrue(
          IntMath.biggestBinomials[k] == Integer.MAX_VALUE
              || !fitsInInt(BigIntegerMath.binomial(IntMath.biggestBinomials[k] + 1, k)));
      // In the first case, any int is valid; in the second, we want to test that the next-bigger
      // int overflows.
    }
    assertFalse(
        fitsInInt(
            BigIntegerMath.binomial(

| *Valid Range* | *Minimum value of 900. Maximum value of 31536000.* |
| *Required*    | *No*                                               |

### Policy

			continue
		}

		name := strings.TrimSpace(c.Text[9:])
		if name == "" {
			error_(c.Pos(), "export missing name")
		}

		if name != n.Name.Name {
			error_(c.Pos(), "export comment has wrong name %q, want %q", name, n.Name.Name)
		}

		doc := ""
		for _, c1 := range n.Doc.List {
			if c1 != c {
				doc += c1.Text + "\n"
			}
		}

		f.ExpFunc = append(f.ExpFunc, &ExpFunc{
			Func:    n,

If you select "Watching" instead of "Releases only" you will receive notifications when someone creates a new issue or question. You can also specify that you only want to be notified about new issues, or discussions, or PRs, etc.

Then you can try and help them solve those questions.

## Ask Questions

      assertTrue(
          IntMath.biggestBinomials[k] == Integer.MAX_VALUE
              || !fitsInInt(BigIntegerMath.binomial(IntMath.biggestBinomials[k] + 1, k)));
      // In the first case, any int is valid; in the second, we want to test that the next-bigger
      // int overflows.
    }
    assertFalse(
        fitsInInt(
            BigIntegerMath.binomial(