@app.put("/items/{item_id}")
async def update_item(
    *,
    item_id: int,
    item: Item = Body(
        openapi_examples={
            "normal": {
                "summary": "A normal example",
                "description": "A **normal** item works correctly.",
                "value": {
                    "name": "Foo",
                    "description": "A very nice Item",
                    "price": 35.4,

import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket
import okhttp3.Protocol
import okhttp3.internal.SuppressSignatureCheck
import okhttp3.internal.platform.Platform
import okhttp3.internal.platform.Platform.Companion.isAndroid

/**
 * Simple non-reflection SocketAdapter for Android Q+.
 *
 * These API assumptions make it unsuitable for use on earlier Android versions.
 */
@SuppressLint("NewApi")
@SuppressSignatureCheck

# Command Line

Usage:

	go tool asm [flags] file

The specified file must be a Go assembly file.
The same assembler is used for all target operating systems and architectures.
The GOOS and GOARCH environment variables set the desired target.

Flags:

	-D name[=value]
		Predefine symbol name with an optional simple value.
		Can be repeated to define multiple symbols.
	-I dir1 -I dir2
		Search for #include files in dir1, dir2, etc,

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

time="2020-07-12T20:45:50Z" level=info msg="config issuer: http://127.0.0.1:5556/dex"
time="2020-07-12T20:45:50Z" level=info msg="config storage: sqlite3"
time="2020-07-12T20:45:50Z" level=info msg="config static client: Example App"
time="2020-07-12T20:45:50Z" level=info msg="config connector: mock"
time="2020-07-12T20:45:50Z" level=info msg="config connector: local passwords enabled"

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code