/**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code object} is a range having the same endpoints and bound types as
   * this range. Note that discrete ranges such as {@code (1..4)} and {@code [2..3]} are <b>not</b>
   * equal to one another, despite the fact that they each contain precisely the same set of values.
   * Similarly, empty ranges are not equal unless they have exactly the same representation, so

O jeito como ele funciona é que você escreve a definição do _schema_ usando formato YAML dentro da _docstring_ de cada função controlando uma rota.

E ele gera _schemas_ OpenAPI.

É assim como funciona no Flask, Starlette, Responder etc.

Mas então, nós temos novamente o problema de ter uma micro-sintaxe, dentro de uma string Python (um grande YAML).

    /**
     * @param data
     * @return hex string
     */
    public static String toHexString ( byte[] data ) {
        return toHexString(data, 0, data.length);
    }


    /**
     * This is the same as {@link jcifs.util.Hexdump#toHexString(int val, int
     * size)} but provides a more practical form when trying to avoid {@link
     * java.lang.String} concatenation and {@link java.lang.StringBuffer}.
     * 

  // this list must have at least one matching (by name) volumeMount in one
  // container in the template. A claim in this list takes precedence over
  // any volumes in the template, with the same name.
  // TODO: Define the behavior if a claim already exists with the same name.
  // +optional
  repeated k8s.io.api.core.v1.PersistentVolumeClaim volumeClaimTemplates = 4;

  // serviceName is the name of the service that governs this StatefulSet.

 * those tasks.
 *
 * <p>Submitted tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the Java Language Specification.
 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

  <parent>
    <groupId>inheritance</groupId>
    <artifactId>parent</artifactId>
    <version>11-SNAPSHOT</version>
  </parent>

  <artifactId>inheritance</artifactId><!-- same as directory name -->
  <name>Model urls inheritance test child</name>

  <scm child.scm.connection.inherit.append.path="true"
       child.scm.developerConnection.inherit.append.path="true"

            // https://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2013/05/explaining-the-shared-resources-plugin/
            // we only allow 1 promotion job running at the same time to avoid website xml conflicts
            feature {
                type = "JetBrains.SharedResources"
                param("locks-param", "WebsiteReleasesXml writeLock")
            }
        }
    }

# Lifespan Events

You can define logic (code) that should be executed before the application **starts up**. This means that this code will be executed **once**, **before** the application **starts receiving requests**.

The same way, you can define logic (code) that should be executed when the application is **shutting down**. In this case, this code will be executed **once**, **after** having handled possibly **many requests**.

 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be