if (bits == 32) {
      return Murmur3_32HashFunction.GOOD_FAST_HASH_32;
    }
    if (bits <= 128) {
      return Murmur3_128HashFunction.GOOD_FAST_HASH_128;
    }

    // Otherwise, join together some 128-bit murmur3s
    int hashFunctionsNeeded = (bits + 127) / 128;
    HashFunction[] hashFunctions = new HashFunction[hashFunctionsNeeded];
    hashFunctions[0] = Murmur3_128HashFunction.GOOD_FAST_HASH_128;

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(
                rowFunction.apply(input),

        assertArrayEquals(encryptionKey, serverData.encryptionKey);
        assertEquals("", serverData.oemDomainName);
    }

    @Test
    void testToString() {
        // Populate serverData with some values
        response.dialectIndex = 5;
        serverData.securityMode = 0x03; // User, Encrypted
        serverData.security = 1;
        serverData.encryptedPasswords = true;
        serverData.maxMpxCount = 10;

            List<UpgradedProperty> upgradedProperties = new Gson().fromJson(reader, new TypeToken<List<UpgradedProperty>>() {}.getType());
            // FIXME There should be no duplicates, yet there are some
            return upgradedProperties.stream()
                .distinct()
                .collect(ImmutableList.toImmutableList());
        } catch (IOException e) {

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial007_an_py310.py hl[1,12:24] *}

这类似于：

```Python
if not (credentials.username == "stanleyjobson") or not (credentials.password == "swordfish"):
    # Return some error
    ...
```

但使用 `secrets.compare_digest()`，可以防御**时差攻击**，更加安全。

### 时差攻击 { #timing-attacks }

什么是**时差攻击**？

假设攻击者试图猜出用户名与密码。

他们发送用户名为 `johndoe`，密码为 `love123` 的请求。

然后，Python 代码执行如下操作：

        // Test potentially retriable errors
        SmbException sharingViolation = new SmbException(NtStatus.NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, false);
        // Sharing violations might be retriable in some contexts
        // The implementation determines this
        assertNotNull(sharingViolation);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should preserve stack trace information")

            );

            tasks.named("composeUp").configure(t -> {
                // Avoid running docker-compose tasks in parallel in CI due to some issues on certain Linux distributions
                if (BuildParams.isCi()) {
                    t.usesService(dockerComposeThrottle);
                }
                t.mustRunAfter(preProcessFixture);

    values =
        copyToList(
            getSubjectGenerator()
                .getSampleElements(getSubjectGenerator().getCollectionSize().getNumElements()));
    sort(values, navigableSet.comparator());

    // some tests assume SEVERAL == 3
    if (values.size() >= 1) {
      a = values.get(0);
      if (values.size() >= 3) {
        b = values.get(1);
        c = values.get(2);
      }
    }
  }

    disabled.setAccessible(true);
    disabled.set(null, true);

    // Now make a parallel FRQ and an associated FinalizableWeakReference to an object, in order to
    // exercise some classes from the parallel ClassLoader.
    AtomicReference<Object> sepFrqA =
        new AtomicReference<Object>(sepFrqC.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance());

    @Mock
    private Properties mockProperties;

    private PropertyConfiguration config;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() throws CIFSException {
        Properties props = new Properties();
        // Set some default test properties
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.username", "testuser");
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.password", "testpass");
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.domain", "testdomain");